Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
evm shower thought: 1 an explosion of L2s are coming 2 block space will be commoditized 3 brand will become the differentiating factor 4 we'll soon see many "L2 for X" narratives 5 some will seed supply by incentivizing developers 6 some will seed demand by incentivizing users 7 fragmentation will make ux much worse
27 replies
9 recasts
58 reactions
Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
agree/disagree?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch @ lunchbreak pfp
borodutch @ lunchbreak
@farcasteradmin.eth
sorry 2021 called they want their insights back
2 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Greg pfp
Greg
@greg
all of these are already happening, no?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
dimalaba.eth pfp
dimalaba.eth
@dimalaba.eth
aren't you going to end up with just a few top L2s? they have strong network effects esp for finance, composability and high friction (unless there's magical UX and cross network unlock)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mac Budkowski ๐Ÿฅ pfp
Mac Budkowski ๐Ÿฅ
@macbudkowski
Why do we need so many new L2s if the ones we already have aren't utilized enough? "L2s are new alt L1s" speculation?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Corbin Page ๐Ÿ‘‘๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Corbin Page ๐Ÿ‘‘๐ŸŽฉ
@corbin.eth
Agree. But I'd argue this is all good for the ecosystem. Tons of experiments in parallel: with custom VMs/costs, custom token/sequencer rewards, etc. We've gotta solve the cross-chain UX problem anyway whether there are 3 L2s or 300.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jesse Pollak ๐Ÿ”ต pfp
Jesse Pollak ๐Ÿ”ต
@jessepollak
yep - we gotta: 1. build apps that people want to use 2. make it easy for people to use those apps across many chains work cut out for us
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
grin pfp
grin
@grin
I hate L2s โ˜น๏ธ Sorry not sorry
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
GIGAMฮžSH pfp
GIGAMฮžSH
@gigamesh
This is why Iโ€™m bullish on Optimism. Imo, the Superchain + retro pgf seems like the most credible vision for reconciling good UX with decentralization/security over the longest time horizon.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Brian Kim pfp
Brian Kim
@brianjckim
i think weโ€™re already at 5/6 but agree weโ€™ll get to 7 before it gets better
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Andโ€ฆ Solana will do well until OP figures out interoperability. Coinbase will continue to do well with Base.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Varun Kumar pfp
Varun Kumar
@vkcs
Unpopular opinion - One application will use many L2s
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
m_j_r pfp
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
complementary to this, I think we see a bunch more of this: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7412 not sure if brands differentiate the L2 itself, imho the very best UX will manifest as a brand that piggybacks as many L2s for convenience. 100% on 5/6, wonder how this translates to provers for validiums.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
antimo ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
antimo ๐ŸŽฉ
@antimofm.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wake ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
wake ๐ŸŽฉ
@wake
Agree. Already underway.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
iSpeakNerd pfp
iSpeakNerd
@ispeaknerd.eth
Further centralization around frontrunners, wallets/dapps, L2s Who's making the L2 aggregator?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan Berckmans pfp
Ryan Berckmans
@ryanb.eth
the UX is probably at an all-time low right now because defragmentation technologies are in development and will scale well as the number of L2s explodes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Marco Rodrigues ๐ŸŒฑ pfp
Marco Rodrigues ๐ŸŒฑ
@macrodrigues.eth
Meanwhile, the percentage of L2 usage last week on Mirror. Check out the full article, if you want to know more: https://mirror.xyz/post3.eth/nCti4X_NEd7fB9hnbiew7cv7UXe22vWt_SKhB8yan8U
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wijuwiju.eth pfp
wijuwiju.eth
@wijuwiju.eth
1-6 are already true, 7 is actually easily solved on the ux (look at Warps which are just ETH with premium for Apple fees, gas, bridge and swaps).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction