Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ross Shuel pfp
Ross Shuel
@shuel.eth
is it more correct to view an efficient prediction market as a mechanism to provide accurate probabilities for outcomes, rather than predicting binary outcomes? e.g. prediction markets correctly assigned Trump a <50% probability of winning the 2016 election.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ross Shuel pfp
Ross Shuel
@shuel.eth
And if so, what is the implication for conditional markets i.e. futarchy? @nicovrg
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

nicovrg (fut/acc) pfp
nicovrg (fut/acc)
@nicovrg
to me prediction markets have an evaluation "resolution" that reward people who were right whereas conditional market protect holders & allow them to express their desire depending of proposal result example ->
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

nicovrg (fut/acc) pfp
nicovrg (fut/acc)
@nicovrg
insider have 60% of token supply & they want to drain treasury - made of liquid stablecoins that value post execution is higher than the 60% supply they own
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nicovrg (fut/acc) pfp
nicovrg (fut/acc)
@nicovrg
one token one vote and they drain the treasury, nothing the little guy can do. as soon as proposal is public the value of token collapse, who would buy this given what's about to unfold?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction