Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
If web2’s moat is data, what is the equivalent for web3?
54 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

mk pfp
mk
@mk
Hopefully no moat.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
This is the ideal development To play the devil’s advocate If history repeats itself (see radio, telephone, television, internet) everything open end up in the hand of few
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mk pfp
mk
@mk
True. Any counter-examples?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
Maybe RSS? Have been relatively distributed although not as popular
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mk pfp
mk
@mk
Yes. Email? Maybe the internet itself?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
gmail + apple together owns 90% market share for email clients despite SMTP being open. I think it is a hard question regarding the Internet itself - what't your take?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

mk pfp
mk
@mk
Yes. I can Create a new email client, but previous data (and maybe even spam filters) does create a moat. Gmail was the first to move on this in earnest. Outside of siloed countries, the internet still seems open. I can host a server, and everyone can connect to it. No licensing like TV, or radio.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Logan pfp
Logan
@dirkx
In these examples, distribution and differentiated product experience created the moat. The difference now is (hopefully) we can incentivize people to create, maintain, and upgrade the underlying open protocols
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction