Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
If web2’s moat is data, what is the equivalent for web3?
54 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

mk pfp
mk
@mk
Hopefully no moat.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
This is the ideal development To play the devil’s advocate If history repeats itself (see radio, telephone, television, internet) everything open end up in the hand of few
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mk pfp
mk
@mk
True. Any counter-examples?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
Maybe RSS? Have been relatively distributed although not as popular
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mk pfp
mk
@mk
Yes. Email? Maybe the internet itself?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
gmail + apple together owns 90% market share for email clients despite SMTP being open. I think it is a hard question regarding the Internet itself - what't your take?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Logan pfp
Logan
@dirkx
In these examples, distribution and differentiated product experience created the moat. The difference now is (hopefully) we can incentivize people to create, maintain, and upgrade the underlying open protocols
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gilles pfp
gilles
@gilles
web3 moats are likely ecosystems of decentralised agents building on top+around a shared protocol (versus web2 central market maker) scarce resource = devs; dev working in one ecosystem can't work in others those with most vibrant developer communities win if moats, they'll be collectively owned — not by one lord
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction