Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mvr 🐹 pfp
mvr 🐹
@mvr
What if, Warpcast would only show active followers? Let's call it the Purge 2.0. But what is the definition of active? Let's take 5 casts in the past 60 days. @geoffgolberg is that any good? Add this to a @dune.eth query and we have an active followers number, take out L0 spammers and we get an even lower active quality followers number. With above parameters, @dwr.eth has 20,5k active qfollowers. How many do you have? Check in the dune query below https://dune.com/queries/4761620
19 replies
15 recasts
68 reactions
Njal pfp
Njal
@cryptonjal
Interesting thought. Interesting for analysing followers. If I use 1 cast in the last 30 days on a fork (thanks Claude for the edits 😁) of this Dune query, there seems to be relative more quality casters inactive than active (well, at least for mine and your account). https://dune.com/queries/4761920?previous_days_t6c1ea=30&times_casted_t6c1ea=1
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Melissa Burr πŸ“ pfp
Melissa Burr πŸ“
@burrrrrberry
I went from 18k to 11k and this would bring me to 6k. It's like the halvening for followers πŸ€£πŸ’€
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
atlasmoth pfp
atlasmoth
@osuji.eth
Looks good, can you adjust this to be at least one cast in the last week? Want to see what's different
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
interesting. there's the Power Rule in social that says 90% of users lurk, 9% engage, and 1% are top-level posters. these adjust slightly across platforms. if that's the case, then having the majority of active users *not* casting is actually kind of normal? obviously we want more people casting but food for thought.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Fookinnowan πŸŽ©πŸ”΅ pfp
Fookinnowan πŸŽ©πŸ”΅
@fookinnowan
good idea to have minimum x number of cast as requirement of active account but the x shouldn't be disclosed else the bot/spam account gonna adjust accordingly. The first rule of Fight Club is: "You do not talk about Fight Club." πŸ˜‰
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
artlu 🎩 pfp
artlu 🎩
@artlu
an alternate proposal for definition of "active" https://warpcast.com/artlu/0xd101a599
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
base pfp
base
@basewtf
I think this is where it will go...and they should do it. I think it'd make them the leader in this key area because then people would have trust these are valuable metrics (Followers/Following). Right now everyone knows it's just a BS number.
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
arob.base.ethπŸ–πŸŽ© pfp
arob.base.ethπŸ–πŸŽ©
@arob1000
Those numbers look real, cool analysis
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kristin Piljay ツ pfp
Kristin Piljay ツ
@kristinpiljay
Interesting! My quality is 68%. That's pretty good!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Saint pfp
Saint
@saintiipapi
Great work man
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Matt πŸŽ©πŸ–πŸŽ­ pfp
Matt πŸŽ©πŸ–πŸŽ­
@gk3345
Could we look at the opposite? How many people am I following who are on the nice list? I am ready for a great purge of who I follow….either spam or no longer active.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Miguelgarest pfp
Miguelgarest
@miguelgarest.eth
I like that. Maybe have that number in our profile and only when hovering taping on the follower count it shows the old number
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jacque(she|her).βŒβ—¨-β—¨ pfp
Jacque(she|her).βŒβ—¨-β—¨
@jacque
Going to tell ya from 5k to what the purge 2.0 would be is closer. I kept saying most likely 90 % of my followers were bots. So at least this is closer. wonder and hope this means for the algorithm that we’re going to see each other more meaning actual human beings in the feed and algo!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
adexmakai.degen.eth pfp
adexmakai.degen.eth
@adexmakai.eth
That would be an absolute purge, but the question is how can users active be determined?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Rafaello.base.eth pfp
Rafaello.base.eth
@rafaello12
lol just take my followers to 2k
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
whimsi pfp
whimsi
@whimsi.eth
i like this i like this a lot v dependent on the spam label algo but qfollowers is a super interesting angle β€” a fluctuating value that almost feels like it could be the profile equivalent of token price πŸ‘οΈπŸ‘οΈ
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nick pfp
Nick
@nintynick.eth
Very interesting that the top 20 all have FID <10000
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pichi πŸŸͺπŸ–πŸΉπŸŽ© 🍑🌸 pfp
Pichi πŸŸͺπŸ–πŸΉπŸŽ© 🍑🌸
@pichi
This is amazing. Thanks for building this. 1000 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
yerbearserker.base.eth πŸ§‰πŸŽ― pfp
yerbearserker.base.eth πŸ§‰πŸŽ―
@yerbearserker
Now this is getting a spicy data set 100% 🫑
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction