Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mvr ๐Ÿน pfp
mvr ๐Ÿน
@mvr
What if, Warpcast would only show active followers? Let's call it the Purge 2.0. But what is the definition of active? Let's take 5 casts in the past 60 days. @geoffgolberg is that any good? Add this to a @dune.eth query and we have an active followers number, take out L0 spammers and we get an even lower active quality followers number. With above parameters, @dwr.eth has 20,5k active qfollowers. How many do you have? Check in the dune query below https://dune.com/queries/4761620
21 replies
14 recasts
67 reactions
Njal pfp
Njal
@cryptonjal
Interesting thought. Interesting for analysing followers. If I use 1 cast in the last 30 days on a fork (thanks Claude for the edits ๐Ÿ˜) of this Dune query, there seems to be relative more quality casters inactive than active (well, at least for mine and your account). https://dune.com/queries/4761920?previous_days_t6c1ea=30&times_casted_t6c1ea=1
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Melissa Burr ๐Ÿ“ pfp
Melissa Burr ๐Ÿ“
@burrrrrberry
I went from 18k to 11k and this would bring me to 6k. It's like the halvening for followers ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ’€
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
interesting. there's the Power Rule in social that says 90% of users lurk, 9% engage, and 1% are top-level posters. these adjust slightly across platforms. if that's the case, then having the majority of active users *not* casting is actually kind of normal? obviously we want more people casting but food for thought.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
atlasmoth pfp
atlasmoth
@osuji.eth
Looks good, can you adjust this to be at least one cast in the last week? Want to see what's different
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Fookinnowan ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต pfp
Fookinnowan ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต
@fookinnowan
good idea to have minimum x number of cast as requirement of active account but the x shouldn't be disclosed else the bot/spam account gonna adjust accordingly. The first rule of Fight Club is: "You do not talk about Fight Club." ๐Ÿ˜‰
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
artlu ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
artlu ๐ŸŽฉ
@artlu
an alternate proposal for definition of "active" https://warpcast.com/artlu/0xd101a599
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
GะฏฮฃฦงHฮ› pfp
GะฏฮฃฦงHฮ›
@gresha.eth
@mvr Thanks! I tried it. My approx. 1.9K followers are 1154. This seems reasonable, although the actual active max may be 100 people. I think the number of casts is not enough for filtering, because I personally know someone who doesn't cast, but writes meaningful things under many casts and is also available in DM.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
base pfp
base
@basewtf
I think this is where it will go...and they should do it. I think it'd make them the leader in this key area because then people would have trust these are valuable metrics (Followers/Following). Right now everyone knows it's just a BS number.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Nicholas pfp
Nicholas
@nintynick.eth
Very interesting that the top 20 all have FID <10000
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
arob.base.eth๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽฉ pfp
arob.base.eth๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽฉ
@arob1000
Those numbers look real, cool analysis
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kristin Piljay๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ pfp
Kristin Piljay๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
@kristinpiljay
Interesting! My quality is 68%. That's pretty good!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Saint pfp
Saint
@saintiipapi
Great work man
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Matt ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽญ pfp
Matt ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽญ
@gk3345
Could we look at the opposite? How many people am I following who are on the nice list? I am ready for a great purge of who I followโ€ฆ.either spam or no longer active.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Miguelgarest pfp
Miguelgarest
@miguelgarest.eth
I like that. Maybe have that number in our profile and only when hovering taping on the follower count it shows the old number
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jacque(she|her).โŒโ—จ-โ—จ pfp
Jacque(she|her).โŒโ—จ-โ—จ
@jacque
Going to tell ya from 5k to what the purge 2.0 would be is closer. I kept saying most likely 90 % of my followers were bots. So at least this is closer. wonder and hope this means for the algorithm that weโ€™re going to see each other more meaning actual human beings in the feed and algo!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
adexmakai.degen.eth pfp
adexmakai.degen.eth
@adexmakai.eth
That would be an absolute purge, but the question is how can users active be determined?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
i like this i like this a lot v dependent on the spam label algo but qfollowers is a super interesting angle โ€” a fluctuating value that almost feels like it could be the profile equivalent of token price ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Njal pfp
Njal
@cryptonjal
115 ๐Ÿ‘
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pichi ๐ŸŸช ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
This is amazing. Thanks for building this. 1000 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction