Anyone have interesting conclusions to this chart? I’m struggling to come up w meaningful long-term positive implications.

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

reading this as marriage being an implication of no eq rights? and now that we have more eq rights, less of a role marriage as an institution plays? 

can you expand pls, genuinely curious.

One way of seeing it is that equal rights PLUS state support reduces the value of marriage. Example: https://unherd.com/2024/08/the-march-of-kamalas-brides/

Another angle, which I generally do agree with, is that governments may actually benefit from weakening the institution of the family:

One way of seeing it is that equal rights PLUS state support reduces the value of marriage. Example: https://unherd.com/2024/08/the-march-of-kamalas-brides/

Another angle, which I generally do agree with, is that governments may actually benefit from weakening the institution of the family: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/why-is-it-good-for-the-state-t-hHpA2t_XRE6xExK17mHRGg#1

Also, it’s important to note that marriage is correlated with socioeconomic status.

Pragmatism (Security) at OP Labs.
Prev: ConsenSys & Coinbase.

Attribs: Friendly, curious, introverted, mid-witted.
Chans: /eth-security /maurelian /stoicism




Also, it’s important to note that marriage is correlated with socioeconomic status. 

https://archive.nytimes.com/economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/marriage-is-for-rich-people/