Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mark pfp
Mark
@markodayan
Hot take: Only EVM-equivalent rollups and systems built on them like app-specific chains are actually canon to Ethereum's rollup-centric roadmap scaling strategy. Making my case in an upcoming article. People may have the impression that this claim is made out of social allegiance, but there are clearly strong technical arguments for it, specifically guaranteeing lock-step synchronization of VM upgrades across rollups and Ethereum that truly realize USC
2 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Jason pfp
Jason
@chaskin.eth
Here for the hot takes & see where you're coming from but imo the fact VMs can innovate while the L1 VM prioritizes security is one of the super powers of the rollup centric roadmap & I wish more VMs did innovate (excited for Georgios/Paradigms new client) Related 👇 vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/05/23/l2exec.html
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tim Robinson pfp
Tim Robinson
@timjrobinson
I'm actually thinking the opposite. The reason they're so similar now is because many apps deploy across 5+ chains. With full chain abstraction every app only needs to deploy once and be usable everywhere, so they can pick the chain with the features they desire and be connected to the rest of the ecosystem. Posting state roots to L1 and using blobs will be paramount though as that ensures they can be composable with all the other chains in a secure way without additional trust assumptions.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction