krel on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

krel pfp

Thinking of ways to visualize our assets and spend rate (at a glance) on Camp but not sure if this framing helps or hurts. Grateful for any feedback or suggestions.

11 replies

0 recast

15 reactions

krel pfp

I suggest it helps bc: - Understanding spend rate is part of the bigger picture when evaluating proposals - The goal of reaching sustainable spend rates (we dont spend more than we make on eg a yearly basis) is healthy for nouns longterm And it might hurt bc: - Framing spend like this might emphasize restrictiveness and being overly protective of the treasury. My tldr stance here is that i believe managing spend is useful but halting spend is bad -- the treasury is meant to be used and nouns as a project wont move fwd w/o the critical function of redeploying auction revenue.

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp

Michael Gingras (lilfrog)

I think this is great. Any sort of visualization is helpful. It would be interesting to see something on each proposal too — how much is this proposal going to impact treasury? I also think it’s helpful to see time series extrapolated into future to see how quickly outflows > inflows will take us to red zone

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Ben pfp

It's about all it needs to be, although I'm concerned this information will tend to push people to use the “trusted builder” tag while placing an unpassable hurdle for new entrants to the experience, a separate topic tho. Helpful information is easy to digest. “Dao Health”

2 replies

0 recast

4 reactions

Skateboard.⌐◨-◨ pfp

Skateboard.⌐◨-◨

it helps , can I fork it to gnars ?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨ pfp

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨

I don’t have a fully developed opinion on what the consequence(s) are from this insights. It’s unlikely that the obvious suggestions are beneficial for forwards motion.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

datadanne pfp

does this handle streams so that only the amount streamed during the 30 day window is accounted for & not the entire amount that was approved in a prop? if not I think it could be a bit misleading if a "team X 2024 funding" prop gets approved since it is comparing funding for a year with a months inflow

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Wilson Cusack pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩

helpful visual -- and a great reason to stop any burn discussions -- we'll get there soon enough

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Davin クマ pfp

investment vs return rations

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨ pfp

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨

Also not convinced that the timeframe is optimal or if we should only be looking at YoY. A better timeframe would prob be decade over decade

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

▫️ Eris ▫️ pfp

▫️ Eris ▫️

the basis of the idea is great, if I were to add any opinion it would be to change subjective aspects a little, such as the colors (green vs red conveys an idea of spending, when in fact the outflows from the treasury are an investment in proliferation and development) and possibly words for something like "generated vs invested" I think these changes would bring a more positive feeling to this process of analyzing results

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction