Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
kenny 🎩 pfp
kenny 🎩
@kenny
was Satoshi obsessed with product or distribution?
14 replies
1 recast
22 reactions
Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
neither
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
kk pfp
kk
@king
Product no doubt
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
christin pfp
christin
@christin
product, subcategory "lore," right?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
based pfp
based
@basedevo
distribution
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
Love that you’re pointing this out. Play a different game & it’s a different motion. πŸ”₯πŸš€
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
moreReese pfp
moreReese
@morereese
The question is leading but in the spirit of answering either/or...if the medium is the message and the protocol is the product, then Satoshi was obsessed with product Bitcoin whitepaper abstract reads a lot more like a product spec than it does a distribution strategy imo
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
InsideTheSim 🎩πŸͺ pfp
InsideTheSim 🎩πŸͺ
@insidethesim.eth
Gotta be distribution because Bitcoin is still a first draft being run in production, hey-ooooooo!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
λ‘λΆ€λ§˜πŸ»β€β„οΈπŸŽ­ pfp
λ‘λΆ€λ§˜πŸ»β€β„οΈπŸŽ­
@dubumother
I think Satoshi prioritized the quality and security of the product
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Apurv pfp
Apurv
@apurvkaushal
the story created by the product. the white paper gives it away...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Andrew pfp
Andrew
@ayorkexta
Definitely product.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kon 🎩 pfp
kon 🎩
@0xxeno
product 100 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sid Kapur pfp
Sid Kapur
@siddykaps
product. he was the first one to focus on 'disrupting' industries with the tech.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Masxon pfp
Masxon
@greybyrd
You mean darpa?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
M.🎭 pfp
M.🎭
@modupe
product imo
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nuconomy βŒβ—¨-β—¨ pfp
nuconomy βŒβ—¨-β—¨
@nuconomy.eth
Yes.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction