keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
Using +EV at this point to me is mostly a red flag 🚩 Or at least a sign of a type of guy
10 replies
19 recasts
64 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
Expand? I guess it kinda condenses a very multidimensional decision into a binary that might not be fair
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jason pfp
Jason
@jachian
I saw singularity, post-money, and +EV Oops https://warpcast.com/six/0xc6a0a76e
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
updating my priors (same guy, different environment)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

franco pfp
franco
@francos.eth
I think its misused/overused. This will get worse. It’s heavily used in Nate Silver’s new book.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nat Eliason pfp
Nat Eliason
@nateliason
Mine is anyone who claims to think from “first principles”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gwynne Michele pfp
Gwynne Michele
@thecurioushermit
I'm suspect of anyone that certain about hitting "singularity" ever. It's a fuzzy tech concept, a theory that we don't even really know the true potential of even happening.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

links 🏴 pfp
links 🏴
@links
What does +EV mean?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
does ev mean enterprise value?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Masky pfp
Masky
@masky.eth
unless he's talking about an Electric Vehicle, then it's cool.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Magic Eden  pfp
Magic Eden
@meonbase
+EV does remind me of poker players but I'm okay with it, warpcast plays poker
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction