Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kaloh pfp
Kaloh
@kaloh
Artists: Now that @drakula lets you mint videos on @zora, how do you feel about someone minting a video of your work? 1. Cool 2. Not cool 3. Depends
4 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Arjan | That Poetry Guy pfp
Arjan | That Poetry Guy
@arjantupan
Do you mean a video displaying or performing my work? Complicated. So, I guess 3. If splits are integrated and used, I could live with it. Or if it's a review. Or if I released it cc0. But earning from my (or any other artist's) work without any form of agreement, no. Great question. 1000 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kaloh pfp
Kaloh
@kaloh
Yes - I was about to publish some videos on drakula from my recent trip to Art Basel and then I figure out it could be problematic without asking for permission
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arjan | That Poetry Guy pfp
Arjan | That Poetry Guy
@arjantupan
That's an interesting case. If you were there on a press pass, abided by the regulations set out by the organisation, there is, in my mind, no doubt you can do that. Not sure if you were accredited, but I believe you should. If you were there as a visitor, I think that a review or report style of video would be okay. A video of the work as is... that's where it becomes more debatable. There are many factors in play. You could always reserve a portion of your earning for just in case. With how most people outside our mad world view this, you probably get a cease-and-desist letter first. Videos of works by people within our Web3 world... these people seem easier to reach and ask for permission just in case.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kaloh pfp
Kaloh
@kaloh
The problem is the financial aspects of people minting the video - you are actually monetizing it
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arjan | That Poetry Guy pfp
Arjan | That Poetry Guy
@arjantupan
Absolutely. But if you are official press, you are reporting. Press monetizes, too. I think that's okay. And if you have doubt on a certain video, reserve some of the earnings for if they come knocking. I think what you do is very justified. You report, you promote art through your channels. I'm not a copyright or IP lawyer, but I believe that is allowed in any case. Worst thing that can happen with this is that people claim earnings. But probably, in a very rare case, you get a cease and desist letter. Then you simply take down the video and be done. You can always offer a split then, too, in good faith, if you want to keep the relation nice. I wouldn't worry too much, but hopefully an IP/copyright lawyer can be more precise about this.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction