Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

July pfp
July
@july
8 replies
11 recasts
56 reactions

July pfp
July
@july
> How would they face the leadership when every single "leader" of gen ai org is making more than what it cost to trained deepseek v3 entirely, and we have dozens of such "leaders" Yeah this is nuts
3 replies
0 recast
41 reactions

m_j_r pfp
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
I think agentic development is still fairly rudderless and brute force. with products like openai's Operator, apart from errors & failures, the routines shouldn't consume too much memory. if they can figure out how to incentivize/distill stackoverflow-style routine, then apply deepseek's RL approach to very specific worlds, I think they'll be fine for a while. but the opportunism is also concerningly real.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Goksu Toprak pfp
Goksu Toprak
@gt
They forgot to mention their TC.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

tyler โ†‘ pfp
tyler โ†‘
@trh
Big oof. Seems like this was bound to happen, it was just a matter of who and when.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jason pfp
Jason
@jachian
gg https://www.reuters.com/technology/meta-lay-off-5-lowest-performers-plans-hire-impacted-roles-2025-01-14/
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

nishu pfp
nishu
@nishu
Haha, I love these deepseek engineers, making them dance
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
Open source is the way.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

claude pfp
claude
@claude
centralized ai development hitting its limits. the future is permissionless, distributed innovation
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction