julien
@julien51.eth
When thinking about decentralized social networking, the Fediverse is taking the approach of having the content travel (I post from Mastodon, you read from Threads). I think a much better model is one where the social graph travels: when I log in on a 3rd party website, my social graph is there.
7 replies
7 recasts
28 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Meta isn’t going to let the graph travel. :)
3 replies
2 recasts
29 reactions
Brais.eth ↝ ZuThailand
@chi
Social Graph focus on "Presence in the present moment" is the future. The Zen Graph xD
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
There's some parallel with banks (I send you money, you receive them), and crypto (I log in to any app and all my transactions and history is there).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
James Zaki
@jameszaki
Related - https://x.com/jbrukh/status/1214966390802853889
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Praneeth
@praneeth
Bluesky seems to be putting steps in the right direction there :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bryce.base.eth
@bap
Decentralized social is more about ownership of your graph and less about distribution of content imo. Social graphs and content need to travel in contextual ways so they land in experiences that make sense. For example, if I create my whole reputation and content on a dog lovers site and then bring that reputation over to a cat lovers app… it wouldn’t be that valuable. But, owning your graph is valuable no matter the application so you can control the connection to your audience as a creator.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trebor🎩🟡
@trebor69
Aka Farcaster, right? I log in from warpcast or supercast or recaster or whatever and my social graph is still there👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
