Josh Stark
@js
metric for social networks: how much of the conversation is just talking about the social network itself? higher in early networks under development (FC) or networks in crisis (Twitter now) lower in "established" networks where rules are stable (Twitter then) What's the "right" amount?
7 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
< 1%
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Peter Kim
@peter
Depends on who you are. If you're in tech, talking about the social network is probably genuinely interesting to you (maybe 10-20%) If you use Twitter/FC for sports content, should be 0%. We need alternate personas/algos for different needs.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
The real question is how much conversation to have about conversations about the conversation
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Avi 💙
@savvyavi
Since I joined Clubhouse, most of the conversation on the platform has been about the platform. It still is. People make deep emotional connections with some platforms. So when new, we’re in delight and awe. When in crisis, we feel sad, angry and even betrayed. In sum: Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam
@adamaziz
imo probably not a good metric absent some sort of sentiment analysis or language processing also metric of what? success? stability?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex
@alfl
The medium is the message. 100% of Twitter is about short form snark. 😂
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zedyuan
@zedyuan
Off the topic but I still remember the early days of Clubhouse when everyone just talk about Clubhouse… then ppl realize it’s more like a feature than a social network.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nate
@c0rv0s
The right amount is like 0.0001% imo. It’s a sign the network/application isn’t mature yet - totally fine in the early days but eventually there’s gotta be more going on
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
