Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Harry pfp
Harry
@htormey
Things I’ll say on farcaster but not on X: Some days NextJS feels like a massive top of funnel scam to get you locked in to Vercel only features. The amount of breaking changes and complexity to utility ratio seems very off with this project…
7 replies
6 recasts
30 reactions

Steve pfp
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
Facts I generally don’t mind for smaller projects where I need to ship something quick, but it’s definitely worth your time to learn how to migrate to another stack/platform.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jört User pfp
Jört User
@jort-user.eth
I've moved to vite, mostly
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

​woj ツ pfp
​woj ツ
@woj.eth
100% — pushing server side rendering so hard is one of those for me
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

‍‍ pfp
‍‍
@git
i agree and if u say it on x ill pull up on anyone disagreeing or arguing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

zach roth pfp
zach roth
@zachroth.eth
as a born again engineer, I get this
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

W1NTΞR pfp
W1NTΞR
@w1nt3r
+1 on top of funnel, $5k paid in stupid overcharges. The problem is even larger b/c their serverless deployment infra pushes you to use many other PaaSes (want a db? — neon, redis? — upstash, websockets — …, etc.)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Deployer pfp
Deployer
@deployer
I've thought this all along
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction