Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
I wish Farcaster had opt-in proof-of-personhood attestations we can attach to our FID. Picturing a permissionless market of options so everyone can decide which are the most credible. Seems this would dramatically reduce the bot problem over the long term?
12 replies
0 recast
55 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Most "bots" people are complaining about on Farcaster are actual humans using mobile devices and ChatGPT. They are uninteresting, not unhuman.
10 replies
0 recast
78 reactions

Chris Carella pfp
Chris Carella
@ccarella.eth
You can read and write them to your connected wallet easily enough.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

pastel ← leo ꓽꓽ) pfp
pastel ← leo ꓽꓽ)
@leopastel
i know @icebreaker has a “Human” credential & you can endorse anyone in your network if you have the credential
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jessi ⌐◨-◨ 🤫🌭  pfp
Jessi ⌐◨-◨ 🤫🌭
@zwillow
Goodness I have mentioned this many times times! Sort of like the blue check mark x had.. Verify these accounts like LinkedIn!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

binocularsXL🚀 pfp
binocularsXL🚀
@binocularsx
It may reduce the bot problem implementing a sort of kyc system It may as well curb making FIDs a commodity as there is an extra layer of identity
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

law pfp
law
@traguy.eth
Or maybe they just introduce a human verification test like the arkose challenge that X does? Doesn’t have to be the exact same thing But something to at least, curb or reduce em Cus it’s getting out of hand
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Miguelgarest  pfp
Miguelgarest
@miguelgarest.eth
What kind of proof?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gamatak pfp
Gamatak
@gmtk
It would be an extremely strange decision for a decentralized social network to implement something like KYC. Properly tuned algorithms can improve the situation. At the moment, most of the casters in the shadowban are indeed bots, which means that the algorithms are working in the right direction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Signor Schober pfp
Signor Schober
@schober
We need an encouragement-of-quality – this means an incentive to post authentic high value content and a disincentive to post low quality noise.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Breck Yunits pfp
Breck Yunits
@breck
Could this tie into live streaming somehow? Watching @gmfarcaster made me realize the solution to the bot problem is to double down heavily on livestreaming in some way. I trust accounts far more after I've interacted with them on a live stream.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rafaello.base.eth pfp
Rafaello.base.eth
@rafaello12
I kind of agree with this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Abubakar🎩 pfp
Abubakar🎩
@bigbenz
Shouldn’t all these problems have been tackled at the point of creating the account ? Wouldn’t that save us of all the stress
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Kreept.degen.eth pfp
Kreept.degen.eth
@kreept
For some reason I feel this could be obtainable by enforcing a couple of things. One of which could include the use of active base names. Maybe through that, it could be easy to detect authentic users and those who aren’t. What do you think?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mai🟪🍖🐹🎩🍡 pfp
Mai🟪🍖🐹🎩🍡
@jorja
Adding proof-of-personhood attestations to Farcaster could really cut down on bots by letting users choose the most trustworthy options. Over time, it would naturally lead to a more reliable and bot-free network but what do I know 😆
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction