Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Famous people’s tweets being cross-posted here is a net negative It’s more talking head content that’s disconnected from the local meta and given they don’t reply, there’s no discourse either If you use the lens of disruption theory, we’re downmarket of X and we need “local” features, not shallow thinkboi transplantation
28 replies
26 recasts
222 reactions
Garrett
@garrett
100% agree. discourse is the lifeblood of social networks and this crossposting just ends up being noise bc there’s no engagement/discourse from the original caster
2 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
JAKE
@jake
I don’t think cross posting and post-cast engagement/discourse are mutually exclusive. I bootstrapped my farcaster habit by cross posting from X but from day 1 doing that I tended to engage more in the comments here because there were more quality replies here from the getgo. Cross posting + engaging I think is good
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Maxximillian.base.eth
@maxximillian
It comes off to me as a cannibalistic social practice that is literally counterproductive (precious time wasted on a non engagement/fake invitation to engage) stealing time that might be used to respond to an active person here; there’s only so much time in a day, I literally have a certain number of minutes to respond each day. Plus it’s socially irresponsible: setting people up to expect discourse but be ignored. Like a hotline number with a photo and a promise but no staff. 🤡
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
