Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
So far this is an interesting talk. Haven't finished it yet though. Will report back if there's anything interesting. But... There's a segment where he compares different social networks to different physical spaces and groups. He compares Farcaster to a casino. https://youtu.be/XUsk7cqZyKU?si=ysrkh2o25YD3XKU0
13 replies
9 recasts
43 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
Another thing he mentioned is that he thinks Farcaster's development is less open than Bluesky. IIRC ATP doesn't have any other clients and repositories other than Bluesky. Devs can only participate in Bluesky via taggers and list providers.
4 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
I do feel that the development of Bluesky is more transparent and addresses the shortcomings of centralised social more head-on The biggest client is fully open source, you can build and choose your own algos, and it has a big emphasis on crowdsourced/modular moderation
0 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
downshift
@downshift.eth
allegedly anyone is free to replicate any part of the system…but many would require immense resources to implement
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Poison Ivy
@ivy
there are definitely other bluesky clients
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Suji Yan
@suji
Bluesky/AT have multiple clients. Their DM (APIs) are open as well.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
