"miyazaki is probably so upset"

you are completely missing the point, of course none of us are aiming to create something that evokes even a sliver of the emotions that Ghibli movies do

this is essentially fan art, accessible to everyone in seconds

ghiblifying everything is cool, but i think recreating others' work will get old pretty quickly

many people haven't felt the joy of creation, and this is just a stepping stone to that

this is a good take

from the user's side - i think the novelty will wear off quickly *because* of how easy it is to do

so any talk about "how upset the OG creator must be" is a waste of air time, bc the truly creative people will use this tool to create new things while everyone else will just go back to mindless consumption

this is a good take

from the user's side - i think the novelty will wear off quickly *because* of how easy it is to do

so any talk about "how upset the OG creator must be" is a waste of air time, bc the truly creative people will use this tool to create new things while everyone else will just go back to mindless consumption

https://warpcast.com/zd/0xb6351735

+1 on it getting old fast, its novel and fun now so lets just embrace while it lasts

also imagine creating an art style so good and recognizable the entire world wants to turn their families into characters of said style and being mad? miyazaki won

https://x.com/cpaik/status/1905019121328177189
I don't think it's so simple

Ironically, this AI-driven appropriation of personal art styles mirrors socialist ideals of collective ownership, yet it thrives in tech sectors that are vocally pro-capitalist.

Tech-driven redistribution invites the ethical question: Are artists like Miyazaki fairly compensated, or is the placation of "additional fame" merely a superficial justification and appeal to perceived virtue?