follow up from earlier

@trish @ccarella.eth @energyonchain

She/her 
Talking *@! In /extracurriculars reminiscing in /gen-x and curating in /trish

https://nouns.build/dao/zora/0x32297B7416294B1ACF404b6148a3C58107ba8afd/33

CEO at Google • co-founder & rectangle mover at /icebreaker • icbk.me/j4ck.fc • /swagcaster • DJ sixsix

The 7 day challenge period for moving value off strikes me as short-sighted and IMO ultimately self-defeating because it limits interoperability with non-OP chains, which will be necessary for mid to long term success.

Building: web3 infrastructure for impact @C4CollabEcon

I get the reasoning: security + disincentivizing taking value out of the ecosystem. But I (maybe naively) think that any system which erects false barriers is opening the door for more efficient competitors to steal a march on them

It’s not a false barrier, though. The post you linked explains why it’s necessary and why it’s 7 days. The OP stack will likely move to zk proofs later on and the waiting period will go away.

I haven’t seen anything to suggest the waiting period is to keep liquidity on the network.

Staff Eng at Iron Fish 🐟 • Building BlockSocks 🧦 • Denver, CO 📍