↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑ pfp
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
follow up from earlier @trish @ccarella.eth @energyonchain
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑ pfp
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
how do @devs feel about OP stack? 🧐
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Evan Hudson pfp
Evan Hudson
@evan-hudson
The 7 day challenge period for moving value off strikes me as short-sighted and IMO ultimately self-defeating because it limits interoperability with non-OP chains, which will be necessary for mid to long term success.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑ pfp
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
sorry what i dont know about this rule?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Evan Hudson pfp
Evan Hudson
@evan-hudson
I get the reasoning: security + disincentivizing taking value out of the ecosystem. But I (maybe naively) think that any system which erects false barriers is opening the door for more efficient competitors to steal a march on them
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

typeof.eth 🔵 pfp
typeof.eth 🔵
@typeof.eth
It’s not a false barrier, though. The post you linked explains why it’s necessary and why it’s 7 days. The OP stack will likely move to zk proofs later on and the waiting period will go away. I haven’t seen anything to suggest the waiting period is to keep liquidity on the network.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction