"onchain nfts" will also be pruned via state expiry eventually

ordinals too

no need to keep that data around forever. some nodes probably will, but you'll have to pay to access those

solana got it right with rent tbh

embrace the fleeting nature of existence 😌

prev: /nook, protocol @ opensea, co-author seaport & stuff.
professional @slokh and @0xalexander fanboy

contract code will likely expire/not be persisted past a certain point, too

last proposal i saw for stateless clients required executed bytecode to be supplied as part of tx data/witness (+ proof that it's the correct bytecode, ofc)

For NFTs stored onchain? Not necessarily for those generated with contract code at runtime

🛝 • FID #5644 • urls.art • LA • orange dao • psg • nba

i like arweave but that's "on a different chain" and not "onchain"

NFT + IPFS is data availability with pruning, the way it should be

Permanence is overrated. Onchain doesn’t have to mean forever. Solana’s rent model actually feels way more honest about the tradeoffs

Paying for archival access is honestly a fair trade. Not all nodes need to carry everyone’s bags

https://polluterofminds.com/blog/in-favor-of-preservation-over-permanance