Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Five years from now, what will be seen as a more impactful launch this year: GPT 4 or Apple headset?
33 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Danish A. pfp
Danish A.
@dajmeri.eth
GPT 4 is already the most impactful launch of the last decade+
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shawki Sukkar pfp
Shawki Sukkar
@shawki
gpt-4
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ishika 🎩 pfp
Ishika 🎩
@ishika
GPT4 because it enables a major runway
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LJW_Wavydude pfp
LJW_Wavydude
@ljw-wavydude
GPT4 is more impactful but consumers will think Apple Headset is more impactful. In 5 years, the magic of GPT4 fades to the background and we take it granted i.e. reversion to the mean analogy: having a smart phone is baseline but as kids, if you were told you would have a computer in your hand, we'd call it magic
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Renee Bigelow pfp
Renee Bigelow
@reneeb
My initial gut reaction says AI is about to permeate all digital products so we will likely have less long term brand durability for knowing which AI is responsible for what. But if Apple’s headset = iPhone not = pencil, a device we use to physically experience things in a new way will have more brand durability.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Giuliano Giacaglia pfp
Giuliano Giacaglia
@giu
Apple headset
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
davisshaver.eth pfp
davisshaver.eth
@davisshaver
GPT-4. Apple VR may expand or even define category, but I think Oculus is close enough that Apple’s product won’t be seen as revolutionary as iPhone, for instance. Parallel would be if Android had come out first.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
j4ck 🥶↑🎩 icebreaker pfp
j4ck 🥶↑🎩 icebreaker
@j4ck.eth
GPT4 in my Apple Headset
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
max @ farcon pfp
max @ farcon
@maxp.eth
Gotta be GPT
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch @ farcon & lunchbreak pfp
borodutch @ farcon & lunchbreak
@farcasteradmin.eth
gpt-4, apple is late to vr game, especially after the big screen beyond
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
m_j_r pfp
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
that's tough, headset has been a mechanical/balance "marlin". I suppose a spec of the materials would be pretty exciting if it goes beyond metal/acrylic.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kiran pfp
Kiran
@kiran
GPT
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shriphani Palakodety pfp
Shriphani Palakodety
@shriphani
gpt-4 . I've seen family members (not in tech) make it an indispensable part of their life - they are not going to strap a brick to their face.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mohit pfp
mohit
@ma
There are always exceptions to the rule, but in general, software tends to be more expansive and impactful than hardware. Again, exceptions exist, but the greatest hardware typically struggles to find market fit without solid software to power it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
forager pfp
forager
@forager
Scenario: AI is critical to the success of a wearable, by enabling a natural language interface, and for AR, by enabling generative graphics. Today AI is a fun proof of concept for nerds, but Apple Headset is the device that puts AI into everyday people’s lives. GPT & AI are the CPU, but Headset is the Apple II.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alberto Ornaghi pfp
Alberto Ornaghi
@alor
GPT-X is a technology, not a product. Everyone remembers Tesla, not the ML software enabling autopilot. No one outside IT knows what big query (or large distributed systems) is, but everyone knows Google. Masses don’t recognize technologies, they remember products.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ludo Landry pfp
Ludo Landry
@ludo
GPT4 is the software, Apple Glasses is the hardware.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rex Dai pfp
Rex Dai
@24
gpt-4
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tagga pfp
tagga
@tagga
GPTphone
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction