Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Five years from now, what will be seen as a more impactful launch this year: GPT 4 or Apple headset?
38 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Danish A. pfp
Danish A.
@dajmeri.eth
GPT 4 is already the most impactful launch of the last decade+
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tagga pfp
tagga
@tagga
GPTphone
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rex Dai pfp
Rex Dai
@24
gpt-4
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
slobo pfp
slobo
@slobo.eth
headset
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
fredrik pfp
fredrik
@fredrik
Gpt4 will be embedded in all software and social media apps too
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ludo Landry pfp
Ludo Landry
@ludo
GPT4 is the software, Apple Glasses is the hardware.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alberto Ornaghi pfp
Alberto Ornaghi
@alor
GPT-X is a technology, not a product. Everyone remembers Tesla, not the ML software enabling autopilot. No one outside IT knows what big query (or large distributed systems) is, but everyone knows Google. Masses donโ€™t recognize technologies, they remember products.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mk pfp
mk
@monishkumar
Apple Headset. GPT4 is amazing software. But, Apple produces magic at the intersection of hardware & software.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex Palmer pfp
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Interesting question. If one way to consider GPT et. al. successful at being a great tool, it may need to become so ubiquitous as to be commoditised; not the regulatory term, the colloquial one). Apple Headset however will likely be a consumer product first. With that said, I think the headset.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
forager pfp
forager
@forager
Scenario: AI is critical to the success of a wearable, by enabling a natural language interface, and for AR, by enabling generative graphics. Today AI is a fun proof of concept for nerds, but Apple Headset is the device that puts AI into everyday peopleโ€™s lives. GPT & AI are the CPU, but Headset is the Apple II.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mohit pfp
mohit
@ma
There are always exceptions to the rule, but in general, software tends to be more expansive and impactful than hardware. Again, exceptions exist, but the greatest hardware typically struggles to find market fit without solid software to power it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shriphani Palakodety pfp
Shriphani Palakodety
@shriphani
gpt-4 . I've seen family members (not in tech) make it an indispensable part of their life - they are not going to strap a brick to their face.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jseam pfp
Jseam
@jseam
llama weight leaks and alpaca leaks cuz u will eventually get gpt4 level performance on ur local device Weight leaks will cause tech companies to be more militant about guarding AI innovations AI innovation will cease to be as open as a tech race to AGI begins Alignment wonโ€™t be solved
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
Which one changes your lifestyle and which one do you change your lifestyle for?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Avi ๐Ÿ’™ pfp
Avi ๐Ÿ’™
@savvyavi
If Packy McCormickโ€™s hypothesis is right, and most of it sounds right to me, Open AI as an Apex Aggregator can grow its ecosystem in ways thatโ€™s not possible for Apple. Link to his long post from earlier today. So worth a read. https://www.notboring.co/p/attention-is-all-you-need https://i.imgur.com/V9PNDVj.jpg
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kiran pfp
Kiran
@kiran
GPT
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐’‚ _๐’ฃ๐’…€_๐’Š‘ pfp
๐’‚ _๐’ฃ๐’…€_๐’Š‘
@m-j-r
that's tough, headset has been a mechanical/balance "marlin". I suppose a spec of the materials would be pretty exciting if it goes beyond metal/acrylic.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
simon pfp
simon
@sa
GPT-4 *with plug-ins*
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
gpt-4, apple is late to vr game, especially after the big screen beyond
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction