Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Why do people think proof of human is useful?
73 replies
35 recasts
104 reactions
rish pfp
rish
@rish
it'll end up the same as "non GMO" label in grocery stores
4 replies
0 recast
46 reactions
max โ†‘๐ŸŽฉ pfp
max โ†‘๐ŸŽฉ
@baseddesigner.eth
To avoid bots in digital products: leaving reviews, sniping memecoins, generating replies
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
seems like @albertwenger has been thinking about this, may have something to add: https://x.com/albertwenger/status/1790719673354318325 https://x.com/albertwenger/status/1790728140089688094
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Because the entire world operates on the fact that we issue identities for real persons for various practical purposes? Passports, drivers licenses, taxes, school, etc. Makes it easy to assure that any services are not Sybil attacked.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
ash pfp
ash
@ashrafstakala
It can be useful in financial systems to help prevent fraud.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tyler โ†‘ pfp
tyler โ†‘
@trh
Connection & story. In certain markets, knowing who you're interacting with and The Why behind it can carry a premium.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Corbin Page pfp
Corbin Page
@corbin.eth
Bots are a real problem for apps that want to be authentic (like WC) and proof of humanity is a stated solution. I donโ€™t think the space has realized how hard the edge cases are to police. Will be interesting to see if World can solve for them. Or maybe the meme/brand is just strong enough that it doesnโ€™t matter.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mac Budkowski แต pfp
Mac Budkowski แต
@macbudkowski
So Sama can share some scraps UBI with us once OpenAI becomes Skynet
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
๐’‚ _๐’ฃ๐’…€_๐’Š‘ pfp
๐’‚ _๐’ฃ๐’…€_๐’Š‘
@m-j-r
mechanically, it's critical to systems like quadratic funding where there's a direct dependency on bona fide personal preference. also, there's kind of stated preference: credible social activity should be valuable as it ostensibly sets the "shelf space" by which content creators gain impressions. no proof of human, no worthwhile competition with jimmy kimmel's trending page or any other illegitimate market of ideas.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nicholas Charriere pfp
Nicholas Charriere
@pushix
Most basic reason is adtech. You want to know the number shown to you of views is actual reach
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Vinay Vasanji pfp
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
I thought it was useful back in the day, with humanetics.super.site I don't believe its a worthy goal to pursue now; any reputation system is prone to being gamed, including being human We're also likely to instruct agents to act on our behalf, and porting humaness reputation to an agent sort of defeats any anticipated benefit (as 1 call center worker in country x could control millions of human anchored agents) I think its more important to establish cryptoeconomic systems that trend/tend towards a desired system outcome
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mental Wealth Academy ๐Ÿ’  pfp
Mental Wealth Academy ๐Ÿ’ 
@metawavestudio
Dead-Internet Theory. I can only imagine as AI tools become more powerful and accessible to the average user more spam and sybil botnets will continue to exist. It wonโ€™t just be finding out if your KOL is using a botnet but finding a needle in the haystack of who isnโ€™t. They will be weaponized. (in theory)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
I think lots of people subscribe to the idea that bots produce all the spam
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
casslin.eth pfp
casslin.eth
@casslineth
Cuz they never lived in developing countries where real ppl kyc can be bought for a low as 5$ even w/ facial recognitions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kieran Daniels ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Kieran Daniels ๐ŸŽฉ
@kdaniels.eth
Because they secretly want to sell ads
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Timur Badretdinov pfp
Timur Badretdinov
@destiner.eth
onchain captcha yes you can buy it en masse, but it still is the best thing we have to prevent abuse
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf ๐ŸŽฉ
@degencast.eth
what if ppl generate 100 thousands bots account here as an experiment?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf ๐ŸŽฉ
@degencast.eth
ppl hate bots and sybils and desperate for solutions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DenizenJuan.โŒโ—จ-โ—จ ใƒ† pfp
DenizenJuan.โŒโ—จ-โ—จ ใƒ†
@dnznjuan
Fair distribution, at least from the issuerโ€™s side. Itโ€™s on the human to be responsible for not losing or selling their proof.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction