Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Why do people think proof of human is useful?
73 replies
82 recasts
186 reactions
rish pfp
rish
@rish
it'll end up the same as "non GMO" label in grocery stores
5 replies
0 recast
56 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
seems like @albertwenger has been thinking about this, may have something to add: https://x.com/albertwenger/status/1790719673354318325 https://x.com/albertwenger/status/1790728140089688094
1 reply
1 recast
12 reactions
max 🎩🚂 pfp
max 🎩🚂
@baseddesigner.eth
To avoid bots in digital products: leaving reviews, sniping memecoins, generating replies
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Because the entire world operates on the fact that we issue identities for real persons for various practical purposes? Passports, drivers licenses, taxes, school, etc. Makes it easy to assure that any services are not Sybil attacked.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
ash pfp
ash
@ashmoney.eth
It can be useful in financial systems to help prevent fraud.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tyler ↑ pfp
tyler ↑
@thehilker.eth
Connection & story. In certain markets, knowing who you're interacting with and The Why behind it can carry a premium.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Corbin Page pfp
Corbin Page
@corbin.eth
Bots are a real problem for apps that want to be authentic (like WC) and proof of humanity is a stated solution. I don’t think the space has realized how hard the edge cases are to police. Will be interesting to see if World can solve for them. Or maybe the meme/brand is just strong enough that it doesn’t matter.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mac Budkowski ᵏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
So Sama can share some scraps UBI with us once OpenAI becomes Skynet
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
m_j_r pfp
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
mechanically, it's critical to systems like quadratic funding where there's a direct dependency on bona fide personal preference. also, there's kind of stated preference: credible social activity should be valuable as it ostensibly sets the "shelf space" by which content creators gain impressions. no proof of human, no worthwhile competition with jimmy kimmel's trending page or any other illegitimate market of ideas.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nicholas Charriere pfp
Nicholas Charriere
@pushix
Most basic reason is adtech. You want to know the number shown to you of views is actual reach
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
I think lots of people subscribe to the idea that bots produce all the spam
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jonas ツ pfp
Jonas ツ
@jmaaloe
Because we live in a world where we’re discussing “proof of gender” in sports and for bathrooms There’s a long way to “proof of human who cares”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
casslin.eth pfp
casslin.eth
@casslineth
Cuz they never lived in developing countries where real ppl kyc can be bought for a low as 5$ even w/ facial recognitions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Because they secretly want to sell ads
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Timur Badretdinov pfp
Timur Badretdinov
@destiner.eth
onchain captcha yes you can buy it en masse, but it still is the best thing we have to prevent abuse
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
veekay pfp
veekay
@veekay
do you feel otherwise?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
what if ppl generate 100 thousands bots account here as an experiment?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
ppl hate bots and sybils and desperate for solutions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DenizenJuan.⌐◨-◨ pfp
DenizenJuan.⌐◨-◨
@dnznjuan
Fair distribution, at least from the issuer’s side. It’s on the human to be responsible for not losing or selling their proof.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction