Dan Romero on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩

Found a bug regarding follower counts: replies/follower is now dramatically different. Newer users actually get *better* engagement per follower than the old users - presumably the result of auto-follow diluting the value of each follower? If you think these numbers seem way too high - you're not wrong. According to this, with my 20k followers I should get 160 replies on average to my cast, but I get maybe a 10th of that! My best guess is that this is because Warpcast hides a significant amount of replies to your casts (spam/low quality filtering) -- @pichi had documented this extensively. That or another bug in my analysis.

7 replies

4 recasts

23 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

I see this consistently. Warpcast vs Airstack What grinds my gears is this community is hypersub gated. Bots don’t buy hypersubs. But about half my subscribers comments don’t make the cut.

5 replies

0 recast

9 reactions

C O M P Ξ Z pfp

There is a huge difference in the number of likes and recasts. I think WC ignores a lot of real stuff.

2 replies

0 recast

7 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

Yeah. That’s 50%. This isn’t some margin of error.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩

Only way out of this: pluggable algorithms with complete transparency. Do most users care? No. But the content producers do, and that's always been a 1:100x ratio and I think it's an opportunity to do better...

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

My priorities are: see the members of my community always then see less spam. If most people here are spam, that’s a huge issue that needs to be solved.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩

I think spam is fine if we can reliably filter it out... and that's a solved problem, we just have to give communities the tools to do it. Unfortunately it seems like it's a bit muddled IMO: channels get moderation, but also get the spam filtering. My view is channels should be 100% community-moderated, and leave the spam filtering of channels to the mods.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x8b0b4c82

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

The new channel approach would never Warpcast spam filters affect members in your channel. So big improvement for today. Your channel, your rules

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

To clarify, I miss a ton of replies from people who own my hypersub for my channel today because they are labeled as spam. With the new changes, they won’t be regulated to show more replies because they have the hypersub? My channel rules will override their warpcast spam label and I will always see them? If so, winning.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

Yes. If you invite them to be a member of your channel, you're in control of what content appears in your channel. Separately, @nonlinear.eth having Hypersub automatically follow new subscribers on FC might be a nice feature for creators.

2 replies

0 recast

4 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩

1. Is the effect of invite status on "show more replies" optional per channel? 2. Alternatively, did you consider making "invite status" available to the moderator and leaving the policy about how that impacts cast visibility up to the moderator? I guess where I'm going with this is that policy belongs in the hands of the channel moderation team, and I predict that wherever policy overlaps with clients you're going to see strange workarounds e.g. a channel wanting an open door policy where everybody appears above "Show more replies", will come up with a hack to have users get themselves "invited" automatically. Unless I'm misunderstanding things, which is often the case.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

C O M P Ξ Z pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction