Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
In you're in favor of "AI safety" (broad definition), what's your most compelling cast-length argument?
38 replies
10 recasts
54 reactions
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
The technology is obviously epochal, but its path still largely unknown. It’s appropriate to have at least *some* humility toward “known unknowns” of a historical magnitude.
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
When has that ever happened in history?
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
A high level of care was present in the development of nuclear bombs. Eg, intense secrecy and multiple layers of safegaurding before possible deployments This isn't "apples to apples", ofc, bc nukes were "known" danger, whereas AI is "possible" danger But some amount of this humility in makers feels right here, too
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Mikko
@moo
British regulated printing press back in a day The 1643 “Ordinance for correcting and regulating the Abuses of the Press” completed Parliament’s takeover of the licensing of printers in Britain. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/printing-ordinance-of-1643-1643/
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vaughn tan
@vt
seems like a good reason to try and do it this time
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Matthew Barton
@mbar
Atomic, but at least we had some theoretical models based in science. AI safety nerds use imaginary rhetoricals
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction