In you're in favor of "AI safety" (broad definition), what's your most compelling cast-length argument?

The technology is obviously epochal, but its path still largely unknown. 

It’s appropriate to have at least *some* humility toward “known unknowns” of a historical magnitude.

building /bracket | talking /greatbooks | ex-BCG, ex-PHD | poli + phil + econ

A high level of care was present in the development of nuclear bombs. Eg, intense secrecy and multiple layers of safegaurding before possible deployments

This isn't "apples to apples", ofc, bc nukes were "known" danger, whereas AI is "possible" danger

But some amount of this humility in makers feels right here, too