Dan Romero on Warpcast

Dan Romero pfp

A reminder: human-generated content is not always useful; AI-generated content can be useful! The usefulness of content is relative to each person. This means reasonable people will differ on classification. This is what makes spam filtering hard.

15 replies

17 recasts

142 reactions

tldr (tim reilly) pfp

tldr (tim reilly)

this is aging like a fine wine. great take.

0 reply

0 recast

14 reactions

𝖉𝖞𝖈𝖕¹ᵍ pfp

𝖉𝖞𝖈𝖕¹ᵍ

warpcast could go edgy and have the model to include users onchain history, poap collection and icebreakers to reflect and effect social standing. i may be biased in thinking /showing up/ could be incentivized better.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

JA Westenberg pfp

@joanwestenberg.eth

as someone who is human, not useful and very interesting I take offense

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Selena Trump 💜 pfp

Selena Trump 💜

Usefulness is subjective and what one person finds valuable another might see as noise. Spam filtering especially in a decentralized or open platform like Warpcast has to balance reducing unwanted content while respecting diverse perspectives on what is useful.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨ pfp

Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨

@joshuafisher.eth

Giving @TimUrban vibes…speaking of which we need him here

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Vlady🎩 pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Push 🎩🤌🏻 pfp

Push 🎩🤌🏻

Hey @littlep do you see yourself as spammy or you think you’re providing value to farcaster as you are rn?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Mehdi Benembarek pfp

Mehdi Benembarek

@mehdi-benembarek

Many came here to have a respectful reach ratio, being inline with the community engagement they wanted to establish with fans, followers, friends etc… Do we want to become a Pavlov experiment or do we really want to experiment a form of digital freedom ? I’m speaking because, being tagged , I feel concerned about all the people that acquired my FT, follow and interact with me, collect my photography etc …It’s mainly about them.

1 reply

1 recast

5 reactions

David Beckham pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Raz pfp

I think you’re trying to solve for too many variables. Non human generated spam should be dealt with differently from non interesting, spammy human generated content. I would think the social layer should filter for the latter, and intervention such as hiding or labelling should only apply to the former ?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

anyvoid 👾 pfp

Hi! So it means that in order to be considered as interesting I have to share content interesting others and not sharing content that interesting me. By doing this I won’t build real relations with others because I don’t share my real interest. For me it sounds like « fake ». I prefer have less engagement but real one, than have more engagement on topics I don’t really mind. So am I a spammy user for being « real »? What do you think ?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Philip Sheldrake pfp

Philip Sheldrake

Perhaps useful is only a subset of valuable. And value is always contextual, so the very same content can appear either side of the y-axis; depends. Happy to help 😆

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3 pfp

meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3

It’s something I admittedly underestimated and undervalued its importance

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

HankMoody pfp

Without a doubt, this is absolutely pioneering for a SocialFi! 👌

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Words of the Day pfp

Words of the Day

What's words of the Day ?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction