duq
@duq
6 replies
8 recasts
46 reactions
3 replies
24 recasts
89 reactions
1 reply
127 recasts
141 reactions
17 replies
31 recasts
181 reactions
0 reply
8 recasts
6 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
4 replies
14 recasts
65 reactions
0 reply
4 recasts
7 reactions
My post from 1.5 years about "assessing demand drivers for ETH" had the line "Needless to say, we’ll need to wait for EIP-4844 to assess this."
Now that EIP-4844 is out for half a year, it's indeed time to do so. As such, I'd downgrade the significance of "L2 fee burns" from 2/10 to 1/10. While it's very likely demand for blobspace is gradually going up, supply is up even more with PeerDAS imminent, plus full sharding & Nielsen's Law making blob count up only. Cross-L2 interoperability has also been much less required than anticipated, as most users are happy to stick to their chosen L2, or bridge between only occasionally
So, why was I (mildly) wrong? I did not fully understand the concept of strict global consensus then, which I only wrote about in depth later in 2023. With a better grasp of the true demand landscape for blobspace, the 1/10 is obvious
Also, this is great for Ethereum/ETH in the same way as building public roads
https://polynya.mirror.xyz/GPC26Y_rlwCyPpj_N3HeW_izY1-pIVwKW5bjuPNrGeQ 11 replies
19 recasts
94 reactions
3 replies
52 recasts
63 reactions
0 reply
6 recasts
18 reactions
0 reply
5 recasts
0 reaction
7 replies
16 recasts
30 reactions
3 replies
4 recasts
28 reactions
0 reply
4 recasts
2 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
2 reactions
