was just pitched uber but decentralized.

i thought we had moved past this.

clicking @clickerxyz (a @daylight ░░░░░░) | kylemccollom.com

I can’t think of anything that regular consumers would want that is made better by being onchain?

big token guy leading @, ex marketing @rainbow, hanging out @ internet

I assume the value would be cutting out the take rate from the middleman (Uber) from the equation. So better prices for riders and more revenue for drivers, which both would want I’m sure.  

I’m not necessarily saying there aren’t reasons this is unrealistic, was just curious what the glaring issues are

I don’t quite get why consumers would bite for that given now there’s no middleman providing safety — I suppose it’s a tradeoff

The big glaring issue for me is I can’t see a reason why this has to be onchain