df on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

df pfp

Idea: Warpcast adds a minimum length for *reply* casts by non active status holders - both when casting and when rendering (these casts are auto collapsed to a "more replies" at the bottom") length of cast is a form of proof of work & harder to pretend to be human when you need to string more than 3 words together

13 replies

9 recasts

46 reactions

phil pfp

or we enforce haikus replies are easy except when you are a bot please sir wen airdrop

2 replies

0 recast

7 reactions

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩

Good idea! but also, wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow wowow

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Vinay Vasanji pfp

@vinayvasanji.eth

The advances in LLMs might beg to differ here—also requiring proof of work via length of cast response will turn all of FC into the equivalent of recipe blogs. Oh you want to make pasta, here's my entire life story first. SEO f'ed up the web, this—if implemented—will f'up FC

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Pranav Yerabati 🎩 pfp

Pranav Yerabati 🎩

Wouldn’t this also lead to new accounts getting incentivised to write more vis-à-vis being straightforward whilst replying?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

veekay pfp

but ser what about my one word bangers 😔

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

aron pfp

would you use a client which lets you define your own rules on what to see in your feed? because i don't see a reason for the protocol to enforce this, but clients for sure. the protocol should remain permissionless imho

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

rafa pfp

It feels like they will get games regardless of the rules. Feels like automated moderation tools, like those previously used by subreddit moderators might come handy here so that each channel can make decisions when needed based on spam issues at a local level

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

hellno the optimist pfp

hellno the optimist

I've got into this race of length + proof of work for NFT comment sections. Increasing the minimum length didn't improve the comment quality

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Michael 🎩🐹 pfp

Michael 🎩🐹

@michaelsullivan

Don’t like it. Needing x amount of followers encourages spammers and leads to a negative feedback loop of people trying to get it. I’ve been here over a year and don’t have it because I stopped trying after hitting 100 followers.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Juli 🎩↑ pfp

Can you pls work on the product. we need to get your ideas into prod

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

hylex pfp

I think this may end up bots writing longer casts than real people. As they don't feel lazy like humans.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

wables pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ashira 🎩🫂🍖🍔💃🏼 pfp

Ashira 🎩🫂🍖🍔💃🏼

Unfortunately, if it’s anything like other forced amounts of words per post (like reviews on some retail websites) likely they’ll get around this by posting song lyrics or repeating the same sentence/words over & over 😕

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction