Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
unfortunately the teams building with a farcaster GTM (but limited integration/dependency) have done better historically than the teams building farcaster clients, which is sad. While some of this effect is unavoidable, some is.
0 reply
2 recasts
45 reactions

castig pfp
castig
@castig.eth
what's an example of the former? The farcaster GTM with limited integration.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sid pfp
Sid
@sidshekhar
farcaster gtm for initial userbase then transition to own platform/ux for main utility? This would make sense in a way if the utility offered is significantly different than warpcast right? vs a client that may have a lot of overlapping features.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

  pfp
@undefined
sorry but what does gtm stand for
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

timdaub pfp
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
that said we would have done much deeper integration if there would have been better credible neutrality to begin with
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
I feel like I have PTCD (Post Traumatic Client Disorder) just from watching secondhand Yall are heroes tho 💪💪💪
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
Would love to hear more on the “, some is” part of this cast 🙏
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Bitfloorsghost pfp
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
tough because the team building fc has a native client you know
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

NLoveSIA🎩Ⓜ️👻 pfp
NLoveSIA🎩Ⓜ️👻
@n7160
yep fact
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction