Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
one way to have cake and eat it to wrt Frames vs Mini Apps is to keep the term Frames but specifically for the interactive thing in feed we'll need to call those components something and this is a nice branded term that maps to the original meaning, otherwise we'll need to a new term like rich embeds or cards
12 replies
2 recasts
43 reactions
tim/vortac
@vortac
This is the way 🫵
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
Apps with Frame Technology. No more names please. With all due respect you’re all great at a lot of things but naming is not one of those things. ✌️💜
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
App --> Mini App Window --> Frame
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Angel - Not A Bot
@sayangel
this gets my vote 🙋♂️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
maybe a cool opportunity for "frames" to become a version of the cast embed that gives you a small, inline preview of the mini app(eg. a mini browser window instead of the static image and button) ^ might make sense in some cases more than others(eg. works well for things like livestreams or quick actions like a vote), regardless i think this could be a cool feature and cool way to keep the name frames alive!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jp 🎩
@jpfraneto.eth
https://warpcast.com/jpfraneto.eth/0x6ffd7069
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jacob
@jrf
windows
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lost Midas
@lostmidas
Seems like you’re splitting hairs with this distinction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
L3MBDA
@l3mbda
you're onto something
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bixby Snyder 🎩
@bixbysnyder.eth
Why are we changing the name of Frames? Any real reason?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hoot 🎩
@owl
Aren't they just embeds with a CTA button? Do we need to give them a special term?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
