Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
I am unaware of an area of law with more bang for its buck for crypto apps than a website’s terms of service. I know terms of service are not the most exciting thing in the world, but if done right, they can make a huge difference in legal liability exposure. The key issue apps run into in this area of law is whether the terms are enforceable on the app’s users. So, I looked into tips for increasing the likelihood of enforceability. Here’s a thread with the TLDR.
7 replies
21 recasts
106 reactions

Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Generally speaking, the “gold standard” for terms of service is a “clickwrap” or “scrollwrap” (I’m treating these as similar things, but different people call these different things). This is when the app presents the full terms, and users click a box saying they’ve read and agree to them. As one court put it: “To ensure that an online agreement passes muster, clickwrap is the safest choice.”
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Greg Lang pfp
Greg Lang
@designheretic
imo terms are a source of missed opportunity to build brand equity by selectively assuming certain liabilities that could be technically avoided if written to do so—especially vis-à-vis privacy policies Thoughts on the idea? Know any projects that have intentionally assumed legal risk for the sake of customers?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
I would like to know what my terms of service should say.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

alli pfp
alli
@alli
slay dan
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
Pure unadulterated gold
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JesseConnor pfp
JesseConnor
@jessec
Thanks for providing a pointer to a less highlighted, yet, high ramification topic!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Locked In (On Fire) pfp
Locked In (On Fire)
@chaplino
Thanks for making me smorter 2000 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction