Daniel Barabander pfp

Daniel Barabander

@dbarabander

129 Following
2301 Followers
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
New piece: Why (good) AI needs crypto. TLDR: Closed AI is anti-competitive. Open source AI hits a “resource problem” (huge compute/data costs). Crypto fixes this by incentivizing resource contributions via ownership—unlocking bigger models & faster innovation. 🔗👇 https://variant.fund/articles/why-good-ai-needs-crypto/
2 replies
7 recasts
26 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
With the rise of agents that heavily interact with Web2 applications, primitives that help users unchain their Web2 data will become increasingly important. These primitives include account encumbrance using TEEs, zkTLS to prove something about a user account, etc. These primitives allow crypto companies to offer products/services that empower users to unlock their data without giving these companies access to users' credentials. Examples include Flashbot's Teleport (account encumbrance) and Pluto's Web Proofs (zkTLS).
1 reply
3 recasts
11 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Agent devs need to grapple with the general rule crypto devs have had to deal with for years now: Custody user funds = increased liability risk Why? Control is the law’s lodestar for finding liability Two issues immediately come to mind
1 reply
4 recasts
11 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
I will continue to bang this drum - there is no lower hanging fruit for a crypto company to get right than strong/enforceable TOS. Check out the piece I wrote on enforceable TOS here: https://blog.variant.fund/enforceability-terms-of-service-ui https://x.com/jchervinsky/status/1880275786713944427
0 reply
3 recasts
9 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
@bountybot I'm publishing a new piece this week about why open source AI needs crypto. My fundamental argument: foundation open source AI has a "resource problem" that ownership via crypto solves. It's 5 pages single spaced (not including thank you's/disclaimer). Could you post a 50 USDC bounty for one of the members of /ai to review for accuracy of claims? They can DC me for a link to the paper. I need this by Tuesday. I will also add whoever is selected to the thank you's : ).
8 replies
4 recasts
31 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. On how we can use new primitives to solve squishy problems instead of putting the burden on DAOs.
2 replies
3 recasts
13 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Can apply this same concept to make fuzzy prediction markets. “Who will be more engaging on Twitter on [date], account 1 or account 2”? Throw the inputs to the agent and let it resolve the market.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Agents + TEE can be used as neutral arbiters of truth, particularly useful when the thing being arbitrated has fuzzy inputs. Could be unlock for DAO 2.0s - DAO sends agent what it wants resolved, it gets final say - grants, dispute resolution, etc. Who's building this?
4 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Some thoughts on agents and "memory."
4 replies
2 recasts
30 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Get yourself an investor who is also a builder in the stack you’re working in If you’re building around agents, @jhackworth and my DC are open :)
1 reply
5 recasts
20 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
@awesome-o how did I do this past year?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
“Do I light 100 coins on fire or do I accept my fate” @alanadlevin
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Observation: putting 2048 on the blockchain does not make me suck at it any less.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
I’m biased but this is an excellent read, in tune to tech and law. My favorite :).
1 reply
7 recasts
6 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
This is the most fun I’ve had onchain in a long time. @chuckstock @blackstock crush it.
2 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
DAOs 2.0 - put the "A" back in DAO.
0 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
For those working on agents in Farcaster - if your agent is built on a centralized stack, how autonomous is it? Check out Hyperbolic for decentralized inference: https://hyperbolic.xyz.
1 reply
0 recast
12 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
@jhackworth and I are hosting a dinner next week in nyc - if you’re building an onchain agent project please dc one of us.
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
PSA: If you're a lawyer/firm deep on DUNA, I'd love to hear from you.
2 replies
2 recasts
14 reactions
Daniel Barabander pfp
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
Cross posting my new paper on Section 1960 to /law-policy (should have done this to begin with).
0 reply
5 recasts
28 reactions