czar
@czar
I love bankr. But I still hold this opinion. My bet on bankr is that it pivots to something very powerful, and this buying stuff through text is just one narrow use case it keeps getting used for.
5 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
Pichi πͺππΉπ© π‘πΈ
@pichi
Hereβs what I know. @deployer is an epic builder. @jtgi is an epic builder. It they both think its worth putting time into, Iβm paying attention.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jtgi
@jtgi
Buying in public is great go to market.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Rch
@rch
it works very well! i see what you mean and i think it can expand from where it is. having the ability to ape into a token from a social feed is pretty cool.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
nick
@nickysap
Itβs a fantastic poc. Novelty will wear thin but likely additional features/capabilities will launch prior to it fizzling out. Dude is hustling
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
kevin j
@entropybender
so with a lot of these "ai agents" we really mean bots on twitter. that's it, that's the unique thing. it's that the realm they exist in is different. i casted about this a while ago but it's a new paradigm that i call "API over Account" since we have LLMs that basically treat natural language as endpoints telegram bots have found their use case and are extremely widely used- unibot during the bear market of all things did 20m+ in revenue. for some reason everyone uses tg bots to buy coins early as well i think everything is still early, and you can think of like infra- you have no clue what will come of building a bot that uses a social feed as an interface, but it's possible now and it wasn't before one obvious element is that the visibility of the bot is massive- twitter/fc goes by a social graph and algorithms boost all accounts, including bots. this isn't a thing in telegram which is a closed loop and cannot perpetually increase engagement. so bankr + any wide-reach game is possible now
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction