Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
17 recasts
17 reactions

kliuless pfp
kliuless
@kliuless
Web2 gamers are won over via their hearts, not their wallets. How about just shipping a fun game instead of ā€œvampire attackingā€? Even the daily terminology we flippantly repeat in Web3 is super cringe for Web2 users. The road to mass adoption is paved by good intentions, not bribery nor theft.
4 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

ciefa šŸŒ eth/acc pfp
ciefa šŸŒ eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
It is crazy how few people building inside the blockchain & web3 gaming space actually understands this. Like, it boggles my mind.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

D Ƙ W N L O R E pfp
D Ƙ W N L O R E
@d0wnlore.eth
No hard data to back it, but many of the takes I saw from people that donā€™t understand it arenā€™t gamers or the last game they played was probably something from the 8-bit/16-bit era (might explain all the pixelart web3 games). Forever falling into the ā€œtokenomics first, gameplay/worldbuilding secondā€ trap.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

kliuless pfp
kliuless
@kliuless
Web3 needs more gamers over speculators for sure!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ciefa šŸŒ eth/acc pfp
ciefa šŸŒ eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
Honestly, I don't even think that's necessary. But what it needs is a shift in how speculators take part in those tokens and how the tokens then are used. Something more equity-like (still on-chain) for example. Doesn't have to be completely out of the game(s) ecosystem(s) - but should be properly thought through.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ciefa šŸŒ eth/acc pfp
ciefa šŸŒ eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
That being said, more gamerrs than speculators would be very nice - but probably leads to more speculators getting in due to the success of the games anyway. but I get your point :)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction