Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
If ETH is money and a store of value, why don't L2 DAOs hold any? How can we claim ETH is money to the world when the most "aligned" organizations in our ecosystem don't hold it themselves?
9 replies
3 recasts
31 reactions

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
https://warpcast.com/chaskin.eth/0xa98ad1d3
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Greg pfp
Greg
@greg
because they would have to dump their own token to aquire ETH (i think)
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
because most of the L2s are not particularly ethereum aligned, they are VC-backed private corps
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cooki pfp
Cooki
@cooki
It's a good point. Do we know why they don't hold it? You could even argue L2s have future ETH liabilities so it could make sense for them to hold some just for operational reasons.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘ pfp
π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘
@m-j-r
all L2 DAOs should have L1 AMOs with nested intents, they can prescribe alignment even further than validators.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Moon pfp
Moon
@moon.eth
if ETH is money then how come I have to use a credit card for like every ETH service like RPC access
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mmu pfp
mmu
@mmu
If ETH is money… ETH cross-chain transfers should be free. If Layer 2s want interoperability with other Layer 2s, including the Layer 1, ETH should be their answer
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

thaykor pfp
thaykor
@darren.eth
The long term sustainability of grant funding is one of the most under discussed topics in L2 governance. Are we just so afraid of discussing price-adjacent topics that we’re creating blind spots?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

FeMMie πŸ§ͺπŸ’¨ pfp
FeMMie πŸ§ͺπŸ’¨
@femmie
kind of ironic lol. preaching eth as money while daos stack stablecoins.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction