Ethereum

Ethereum and its L2s are about to feel like one unified network

Step 1 -> finalizing the address format standard and we’re getting close

Before: 0x6A1... -> Which chain for tokens? 🤷‍♂️
After: 0x6A1...:Base:8453 -> Clearly on Base!

nice! so this is different from ERC-3770 right?

the format feels more intuitive to me

/ethereum foundation | control the memes control the minds paragraph.xyz/@chaskin

Ya 3770 was used as a starting point but it's slightly different

nice! so this is different from ERC-3770 right?

the format feels more intuitive to me

https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3770

Permissionless public infrastructure. Contributing to Optimism at OP Labs. 
🇨🇦🏔️ https://www.pauldowman.com

Good catch. I didn't want to get too deep into the specifics in that cast but you're right that my Base example was redundant. The root part only needs to be used when the ENS name is deployed on a chain other than Ethereum Mainnet. For example, "example.eth:optimism:10" would check on the ENS registry on Optimism itself

I don't understand chain vs root. Isn't the root part redundant? And isn't ...:ethereum:11155111 contradictory?

Interested in ZK, FHE, PUFs, hardware, system design, ai safety, and smart contact security.

It's there a specific erc for this format?

Blob apreciatoooor.
Other than crypto i'm Interested in technology, business, chess, running 

https://paragraph.xyz/@oliverk120

No hard fork needed, this will all be handled by the wallets, just need to finalize the standard

so every client needs to bake in support for chain names to use this? why not use chainid?