Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

caz.eth pfp
caz.eth
@caz.eth
There has been a lot of spam on XMTP these past few days, so wouldn’t it be cool to have: staked and non-staked addresses, where users can choose in the app layer to only receive messages from staked addresses. If the adress receives enough complaints (governed by smart contract) the address is slashed. ?
7 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

EmpiricalLagrange pfp
EmpiricalLagrange
@eulerlagrange.eth
@smc
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

makemake  pfp
makemake
@makemake
How about a pow to send a message?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
Airstack released a spam filter today! @betashop.eth For More: https://docs.airstack.xyz/airstack-docs-and-faqs/guides/has-xmtp/spam-filters
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

justin.framedl.eth pfp
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
following our thread the other day, while again not a direct solution, this also seems like it could be a novel workaround, @notdevin.eth @solana1
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Emre Ekinci pfp
Emre Ekinci
@emr.eth
nah fam this ain’t it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron pfp
Cameron
@dongambas.eth
this would help prevent general spam but for effective high EV scams this wouldn’t deter bad actors unless the stake was real high, and if the stake was real high would crowd out normal users.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

0xRob pfp
0xRob
@0xrob
This is a great idea, pay-to-message has been tried a couple times but never got traction. Using a stake instead of payment might solve those issues.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions