There’s been more conflict on Farcaster this weekend than any in my recent memory (except maybe the invite floodgate??) 👀😩🤷‍♂️

Do you think it’s due to an increase in psychological safety, niceness fatigue, we’ve reached enough scale to support legitimate factions, or something else?

cto @ bwl.gg (lunchbreak.com), 80M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 built @remindme, @mintit, @gpt, @healthbot, farcantasy.xyz

Purple | Farcaster Superpowers. try for yourself at getpurple.xyz

/cameron for content experiments. I help Creators grow faster @ seemore.tv + /seemore. Curating in /lounge. 
Dev + Veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

DAOs have constructive conflict at the center. It would be worse if people who disagreed did not feel they could say something. The important thing is we come back together, support and kick ass when a prop is passed. Diversity of thought & parallel execution are 2 things that make DAOs different from trad-org.

At least one of these is business as usual (regular conflict creator creating conflict)

Examples:
-@getpurple back and forth
-@kazi assertions
-Nouns fork discussions (this seemed mostly towards folks outside of FC)
-@farcasteradmin.eth choosing violence 😂
- and all the offshoots and replycasts and sub casts from these that aren’t immediately obvious unless you’re reading deep in the reply trees

Also for anyone thinking I’m sounding an doomsday alarm 😂

“More Conflict” doesn’t equal “War-torn Hellscape” 

At least for me anyway 🫡

Cohost /gmfarcaster livestream Farcaster news and culture show🎙️💬 Founder Tenger Ways, bringing joy into work with DevOps practices 🤗 mom x 3 💗

lol ditto I read this and was like what corner of Farcaster am I missing out on??!

I’m good. 

It’s been a good data gathering weekend for future content 🫡

I hear that and broadly agree - I just wanted to lead w the potential for positivity 👀👀👀

GM cameron ☀️ how you doin? 

I didn’t notice a significant uptick in conflict platform wide. 

First thought: Psysch safety is necessary ingredient for constructive conflict, but doesn’t lead to conflict. In my experience I see conflict coming from misaligned goals, values, and insecurity.

Probably enough people here to fill a support group

Don’t even know if i saw the cast but @farcasteradmin.eth choosing violence just feels on brand. I got caught in one of his traps in my early days here. I’ve forgiven him for my flash of embarrassment but haven’t forgotten 🤨😘

👨‍💻 @unofficial and /outside, b4 spotify, peloton

Staff Eng at Iron Fish • Building BlockSocks 🧦

Let’s not forget the most egregious incident of all, @christopher outbidding me on a purple nft 😠

I didn't notice unusual conflict (outside of the 🟣 Prop 37 thread). I don't imagine long-term factors like psych safety erosion are suddenly at play. But maybe now that people are more settled here, they can afford to be a little more direct / less cautious about making good first impressions?

I think that’s real - I do think that 

nothing…nothing…nothing… everything all at once 

dynamics are going to happen more and more as we get deeper in the bear though.

Co-Founder 

Follow Me: https://nf.td/metaend

A few things:
-@purple back and forth
-@kazi assertions
-Nouns fork discussions (this seemed mostly towards folks outside of FC)
-@farcasteradmin.eth choosing violence 😂
- and all the offshoots and replycasts and sub casts from these that aren’t immediately obvious unless you’re reading deep in the reply trees

around the block | prev burrata, chainalysis, circle, & draftkings

We’ll wrestle the vibe back 🫡

(Need your help tho)

I think it’s the new users tbh, we had a nice upspoken rule of respect and it feels like farcaster became twitter overnight to me. Genuinely feels like it’s been about a week or two of this.

Head of Product (and inst. asset issuer onboarding) @plumenetwork. Building https://transferagentprotocol.xyz on it. Hosting /rwa and /plume

I completely missed all of it and am so out of the loop ngl 🤷‍♂️


*insert meme* what happened here 👀

Head of Engineering at Courtyard.io, bringing physical collectibles onchain. nf.td/joe /courtyard /backend

yea conflict doesn’t mean unhealthy, just a different set of conversations than in previous weekends

I think it's been pretty healthy but maybe I've not seen the true vitriol

/zoz | OG | FID: 1918 | ✊☀️/0l | $DEGEN on @base 

No war to fight so degens fight themselves?

Violence across all ‘crypto’ platforms. It’s the cycle of degenism

experience-building and investing in the future of the internet

It’s for sure that as this platform grows, people will feel as though they can get away with saying increasingly aggressive and/or ridiculous things.

I think it just comes with the territory on socials of scale.

Dev. Writing "The Marketing Compass" newsletter, themed around marketing from first principles to help fellow devs learn to attract users and customers

Could be - what would you prefer to talk about

What if the true conflict is actually the attempt to make stories of nothing, dividing us and making us feel like there are conflicting factions now 🤔

rough

what vibes are you trying to avoid the most

Ya'll turning this place into xsky

https://warpcast.com/iammatthias/0x09a37c

Building TogetherCrew.com | single parent x 4 | seeker of adventure | survivor of chaos
Alfa channel on parenting teens 

Don’t disagree, but how do you measure constructive vs not

Was gone on a non-themed Unconference with ppl from the remote work field & checked out. Men got invited but didn’t show up, bcoz it was too unstructured.

About your post: if it’s constructive conflict it’s good. You want that. Especially in DAOs.

🖖| via sequence. pimlico. poap. polygon. consensys. paxful. flipside crypto. dash. bridgewater associates. darpa. secdef. navy. dia | linktr.ee/alexanderchopan

Probably 🤷‍♂️

I’m loud and that annoys some people and I get that.

I missed all of it so it's probably because I wasn't here