Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

🗿 pfp
🗿
@bias
here’s how we settle the Ai outputs debate once and for all: if I tell you to paint a picture of a dog and then you do, did I create art?
16 replies
0 recast
33 reactions

🗿 pfp
🗿
@bias
now, if I take your painting of a dog and I remix it into something else, did I create art?
3 replies
0 recast
16 reactions

brennen pfp
brennen
@brennen.eth
Everything is art if it has intention
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Royal pfp
Royal
@royalaid.eth
I think people just want to measure the amount of effort put in. If there isn't a ton of effort they discount it as slop. If someone spends a ton of time in an AI editor exclusively prompting and refining and then refining sections but only using AI tools did they make art? If took them 5 mins of this loop? If it took them 5 hours? 50 hours?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tricil pfp
tricil
@tricil.eth
That's an interesting question? It really depends on how we define "creating art?" If you provide the inspiration and direction, you could argue that you played a crucial role in the creation process? However, the actual execution and interpretation come from the AI? So, in a sense, it becomes a collaboration between your vision and the AI's capabilities? The line between creator and tool can often blur in these scenarios? What are your thoughts!
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

matthias pfp
matthias
@iammatthias
the AI output debate is largely just a rehash of the Andy Warhol debate, which is largely just a rehash of the Disney debate, which is largely just a rehash of the Edison debate, which … etc You created if the memory hole says so
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
What debate? Apparently You are the ultimate arbiter of what is art and whatever you judge to be worthy is what counts, so you can just tell us 🤗
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

maurelian  pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
I don’t have a dog this fight, but Warhol and Banksy both employ(ed) teams to assemble their visions. Warhol was known for just calling his team by phone with instructions when he had an idea (source: vague recollection but it’s plausible)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Duraa pfp
Duraa
@duraa.eth
Is this question was in the last travan space ? @tricil.eth was traveling at the time of it 💀
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

daivd 🎩👽 ↑ pfp
daivd 🎩👽 ↑
@qt
Depends dog
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Tom Beck pfp
Tom Beck
@tombeck.eth
Except “AI” is not a “you” in this scenario, it’s an “it.”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan pfp
Dan
@seyex.eth
no you didn’t if i spend my time and effort making it, it is it art and not yours
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

frdysk.framedl.eth pfp
frdysk.framedl.eth
@frdysk
I think it's all about perspective and story behind the 'art'. I believe anyone can conjure and evoke beautiful art, but not everyone has a story behind the art that will grab attention.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

@shan.eth🐱 pfp
@shan.eth🐱
@frend.eth
Bias its my birthday wish me luck ❤️
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Freytrades🎩📈 pfp
Freytrades🎩📈
@freymon.eth
no you were an inspiration of art but you didn’t create it.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Wen 🌸 pfp
Wen 🌸
@wenedy
No, the person you told to created the art.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction