Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
💟❓❓❓ If you were joining another app on the Farcaster network/protocol, would you expect your followers from this app to automatically be there? Would you prefer: 1. Followers are same across all apps on FC protocol 2. Manually decide when joining new app 3. Different followers on different apps 4. Smth
22 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
Appreciate all the thoughts here!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Avi 💙 pfp
Avi 💙
@savvyavi
An excellent question. My preference would be for a prompt that asks if l want all followers and if not, offers me a way to easily unselect some (based on the platform.) Perhaps people who follow me on a visual first platform like IG, wouldn’t want me on a platform like Twitter or audio only like Clubhouse.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben 🟪 pfp
Ben 🟪
@benersing
4. Same social graph (followers) but ability for them to toggle on/off at client level without un following altogether
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
scottrepreneur pfp
scottrepreneur
@scottrepreneur
I like the option in 2. If the content is similar enough then same follows should work. I'm excited for some client(s) to support lists, so maybe there's a standard feed/list that is Farcaster-wide and one that could be curated for that specific client.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tomu pfp
Tomu
@tomu
2 decide what content is available to whom
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wijuwiju.eth pfp
wijuwiju.eth
@wijuwiju.eth
You social graphs are user case specific, apps may only make it easier for you to port ur existing graphs once you onboard. Plus don’t forget that there are few protocols, many apps and verticals that might need to compose experience in crazy number of ways, and it’s not just social graph.. identity, configs, etc
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Connor McCormick pfp
Connor McCormick
@nor
I think unless you have a reason why you wouldn’t want anyone to see your posts there, you should inherit all your followers.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matt Bateman pfp
Matt Bateman
@matt
1
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
I’d add that this is where identity curation and remixing becomes interesting. People will be able to “try-on” different, amps, or whatever relative metric, change their “follow” crowd and experience different things. Instead of static silos, you create dynamic silos, rotation.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
Default my pre-existing connections, with the option to boast relative to the use-case of said app. Hence, amps. I think the team is hitting on big-ness there.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vinay Vasanji pfp
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
Different contexts = different relationships so #3
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
moreReese pfp
moreReese
@morereese
2 & 3. 2 when I join a new app (based on follower list in #1). then it grows over time and looks more like #3
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Akim Gue pfp
Akim Gue
@akigue
1 would be cool!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zico pfp
zico
@zico
2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zico pfp
zico
@zico
2 optionality is best
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MC10 | Bankless Consulting 🎯 pfp
MC10 | Bankless Consulting 🎯
@mc10
I would like to see my followers come with me across apps, but would my followers like that?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sam Jain pfp
Sam Jain
@sambhavjaineth
1 sounds good but 2 sounds better
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sean Bonner 🔥 pfp
Sean Bonner 🔥
@seanbonner.eth
Same across is best. So #1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction