Jason Goldberg pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
💟❓❓❓ If you were joining another app on the Farcaster network/protocol, would you expect your followers from this app to automatically be there? Would you prefer: 1. Followers are same across all apps on FC protocol 2. Manually decide when joining new app 3. Different followers on different apps 4. Smth
22 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
Appreciate all the thoughts here!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Avi 💙 pfp
Avi 💙
@savvyavi
An excellent question. My preference would be for a prompt that asks if l want all followers and if not, offers me a way to easily unselect some (based on the platform.) Perhaps people who follow me on a visual first platform like IG, wouldn’t want me on a platform like Twitter or audio only like Clubhouse.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben pfp
Ben
@benersing
4. Same social graph (followers) but ability for them to toggle on/off at client level without un following altogether
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
scottrepreneur pfp
scottrepreneur
@scottrepreneur.eth
I like the option in 2. If the content is similar enough then same follows should work. I'm excited for some client(s) to support lists, so maybe there's a standard feed/list that is Farcaster-wide and one that could be curated for that specific client.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu
2 decide what content is available to whom
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
I think unless you have a reason why you wouldn’t want anyone to see your posts there, you should inherit all your followers.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matt Bateman pfp
Matt Bateman
@matt
1
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
I’d add that this is where identity curation and remixing becomes interesting. People will be able to “try-on” different, amps, or whatever relative metric, change their “follow” crowd and experience different things. Instead of static silos, you create dynamic silos, rotation.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
Default my pre-existing connections, with the option to boast relative to the use-case of said app. Hence, amps. I think the team is hitting on big-ness there.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vinay Vasanji pfp
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
Different contexts = different relationships so #3
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
moreReese pfp
moreReese
@morereese
2 & 3. 2 when I join a new app (based on follower list in #1). then it grows over time and looks more like #3
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Akim pfp
Akim
@akigue
1 would be cool!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zico pfp
zico
@zico
2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zico pfp
zico
@zico
2 optionality is best
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MC10 | Bankless Consulting 🎯 pfp
MC10 | Bankless Consulting 🎯
@mc10
I would like to see my followers come with me across apps, but would my followers like that?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sam Jain pfp
Sam Jain
@sambhavjaineth
1 sounds good but 2 sounds better
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sean Bonner 🔥 pfp
Sean Bonner 🔥
@seanbonner.eth
Same across is best. So #1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Lombraña pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
I would go with number 1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction