balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
From NFTs to nifties Most people think NFTs are expensive jpegs. But you can now send millions of NFTs for a few bucks rather than buying one NFT for a few million bucks. That means NFTs will be as common as likes or RTs. So we need a term for these free, nontransferable, earned NFTs. Perhaps we call them nifties.
31 replies
14 recasts
62 reactions

Jean Hansen pfp
Jean Hansen
@peerbase
https://twitter.com/bypeerbase/status/1588558843331903489 collecting is the new like.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jacob pfp
jacob
@jacob
This was the in-vogue term in 2018. And Nifty Gateway tried to lean on this heavily (including its name of course). It didn’t really stick then but maybe it does the next time around. The framing that has traction at least right now is that they’re images, videos, songs etc that happen to be onchain.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
for @event we’re planning to call them passes and mostly abstract the tech away starting with crypto communities gives us the space to experiment with that abstraction before mainstream adoption
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Alex Danco pfp
Alex Danco
@
“Cookies”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

krish pfp
krish
@0xkrishb
Digital Collectables is by far the simplest and best way to publicly showcase NFTs. Nifties is also a refreshing word.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Meg pfp
Meg
@meganmichelle.eth
Could also play off the word collectible. Collects!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gremplin pfp
Gremplin
@gremplin
These are effectively loaded emojis you’re describing, feel it should have a totally diff feel than NFT generally (that also needs a rebrand). Indelible marks evokes Freckles or maybe Sigils but probably a whole ass new word!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Perhaps whichever platform figures out how to make this happen at scale first will end up informally naming the primitive for people So if a given FC channel mod’s “upvoting” results in some kind of novel recognition for user (eg a “nod”) — I think it will be natural for people to call the primitive that
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rafi pfp
Rafi
@rafi
~ Time to get nifties in here ~ https://youtu.be/I1188GO4p1E
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Manuel pfp
Manuel
@manuelmaccou.eth
Attestations
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

robin :•> pfp
robin :•>
@robin
in the case of lens protocol, likes + RTs are literally NFTs
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Aaina  pfp
Aaina
@aaina
I think soul-bound is just right to convey the alarm factor of a non-transferable NFT.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
have you had a chance to dig into ERC-6551 - tokenbound accounts ? NFTs that own smart contracts that own any assets, erc20, 1155, 721, and more 6551 accounts , like 🪆🪆🪆 The top level NFTs can dynamically update based on the assets underneath
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Manuel pfp
Manuel
@manuelmaccou.eth
What platform allows you to mint so many NFTs for so cheap? Is that Zora?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Uncle Davo pfp
Uncle Davo
@uncledavo
Memintos
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu.eth
so far this fas been the main approach: onchain content for web3 users digital collectibles for web2 users
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joe Toledano pfp
Joe Toledano
@joetoledano
@griffin
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mac Budkowski ᵏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
Coming up with new names is def useful. POAPs are basically NFTs on a xDAI (now Gnosis) chain and the fact that they their name for these free, proof of attendance NFTs stuck is a great example that it can be done successfully.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Giuliano Giacaglia pfp
Giuliano Giacaglia
@giu
NFTs ftw
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction