GN and question for the group.

When you read these words, what comes to mind?

1. "Radical honesty"
2. "Radical transparency"

Productising RWAfi @plumenetwork. Building https://transferagentprotocol.xyz on it. Hosting /rwa and /plume and /nest

What comes to mind is the radical candor framework for leadership (from the eponymous book), and finding an elusive balance between (i) ruinous empathy, (ii) compassionate candor, (iii) obnoxious agression, and (iv) manipulative insincerity.

PhD in aviation ∩ climate science | Aviator, diver, ETH maxi, nexialist | Host of /diving /ethfinance /eth-staker /geopolitics /science /singapore /thomas

(i) is low challenge / high care, (ii) is high on both, (iii) is low care / high challenge, and (iv) is low on both.

I’m speculating the individual contributor group is overrepresented in here so maybe this does not resonate as widely, but the book is worth a read for leaders/people managers.

The open web is dead, long live the open web. ⌐◨-◨

Building /warpcast and /farcaster

— gabrielayuso.com

I’m guessing you mean ICs, right? For non-ICs i think the benefits are obvious, but I agree that even ICs can benefit indirectly

non-ICs can benefit a lot from knowing this framework. Few operate in a vacuum and should seek and provide feedback on ideas and execution.

"individual contributor group is overrepresented"
Oh, good insight - hadn't considered that, but yeah, that's prob likely.