androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
This is the dream -- cooperation through economic incentives rather than through economic or military coercion That said, I wonder if it's sustainable because money tends to agglomerate over time, and power structures naturally arise What keeps the system balanced? https://x.com/buchmanster/status/1873769448307626075
8 replies
5 recasts
30 reactions
will
@w
“Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." 😕
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Marwan ♋️
@marwan1337
Remember that money is just an abstraction. An incredibly useful and powerful one, but an abstraction nonetheless. Hopefully one day we can figure out how to facilitate economic exchange with something more representative of the energy expended, resources used, and value added.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
DV (insert a lot of emojis)
@degenveteran.eth
Major corporations They will be more transparent now as to how they control the countries they operate in (yes they sway because that's what money does which you pointed out the power it has on motive) I feel like there will be major figure heads for each geographic area that act similar to the president they are closely connected with (so Elon for Northern America etc)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
kenny 🎩
@kenny
a system where whoever has the most of the money doesn't also get to set the legal rules everyone has to live by separation of money and state
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
MJC
@mjc716
the best institutions have knobs to reset their decay half-life, but all are ultimately fallible
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂
@jvaleska.eth
capital concentration is a capitalism problem.. fix it and the answer is yes, this would be sustainable.. money does not tend agglomerate per se.. it is an effect of a bad redistribution system.. or a bad balanced system in terms of salaries / work done.. the answer is to have more balanced salaries.. just compare any ceo and any average doctor or nurse wages.. fix it to balance the system.. then, fix human exploitation.. maybe through options instead just a salary.. then remove, centralized power over companies.. something like companies controlled by their workers (daos) then, add a way to redistribute the money from strong hands to weak hands.. and you get a balanced system.. I guess
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Roadu 🎩🦊
@roadu
things dont have to work forever to be worth doing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
a1z2
@a1z2
If a state keeps the system in balance, as I think it should with the caveat that there are many types of states that are more or less desirable, then one can make the argument that there’s no distinction between incentives and coercion. That any form of selection of this economic policy over that policy is a form of distortion and represents a point of view. That’s why democracy is important— because people keep the system balanced (or attempt to).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
