Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Much like bundling-unbundling cycles, I think we also have local-global cycles We’re now trending back towards localism. With too much noise relative to signal and loss of trust in authorities, we’ll prefer smaller groups and “local” leaders The winning technology of this arc will enable this type of coordination
9 replies
24 recasts
43 reactions
Royal
@royalaid.eth
Got it, gonna launch another univ2, that will fix the problem
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Ran Domero
@randomerror.eth
no idea what this means but it's provocative. go off
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett
@garrett
Small groups > large groups especially for certain social contexts where there’s consistent engagement
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Just Build
@justbuild
I really like this take. Makes sense in a reality bending world that you would only trust what you can physically see, touch, and hear.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
This is also happening IRL with the mass city exodus to “red states”.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
💯Very insightful. Local is the trend rn.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
miguelito
@mc
🎯
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Maretus
@maretus.eth
Just had an idea that might work in crypto.. A LETS (local exchange trading system) on chain. I envision it as almost a dau but with a goal of allowing members to borrow/repay money based on their established reputation in that LETS. Or by putting up product/services as collateral. I’m not sure how it would work tbh, but I think it could be a powerful tool for small local communities to self organize and help each other in a more impactful way. It would certainly embody the ideals of crypto.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aunt HoⓂ️ie
@infinitehomie
Local Leaders around here are just as silly. But you’re right, it’s sometimes nice to deal with the local goings on of life.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
