Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Remember "blockchains can't scale"?
6 replies
8 recasts
304 reactions
Cassie Heart
@cassie
@ me when this number passes 2000.
1 reply
1 recast
86 reactions
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
And I thought the magic number was 65k. I mean is not even a scale issue all those EVM chains measured on l2 beat probably could go well over 2k is just a lack of activity. Plus for me, l2s are not a neat scale solution, with the state all over and infrastructure mainly run by a handful of private companies, but alas, fees of 0.001$ are better than a global state.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
it's a specific number where i expect certain issues to arise in the current state of affairs for the L2s, i don't see 65k happening any time soon. purely in terms of theoreticals (assuming the expectations are surpassed) if max OP fork L2 saturation were possible with the theorised gigagas target, the max would be: 47,619 (max of cheapest txs possible under a gigagas block) / 2 (2s block time) * 6 (max number of gigagas OP fork L2s, assuming this can even fit six of these full blocks consistently in a blob sidecar (they cannot)) = 142,857 TPS
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
I had no idea what the theoretical max was, but I think is safe to assume that is more realistic 2k to pose issues than to reach 6-7% of the max anytime soon. Last year evolution was below hype I expect it to stay in the same range.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction