Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
Question for ethereum experts: Is mainnet a safer store of value than L2s? Or is safety on both primarily a factor of my ability to safeguard my seed phrase? In other words, if I transact primarily on L2s, is there a reason why I might still prefer to store most of my eth on mainnet?
5 replies
1 recast
12 reactions

Roberto Bayardo 🎩 pfp
Roberto Bayardo 🎩
@bayardo.eth
Yes, L1 is still most secure. All L2s have additional attack surface area, and none of them are fully permissionless ("stage 2") at this point either. https://medium.com/l2beat/introducing-stages-a-framework-to-evaluate-rollups-maturity-d290bb22befe
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Mark Hilgenberg   pfp
Mark Hilgenberg
@hilgi
Bridges are attack vectors also, so there is a risk moving back and forth. Isn't crypto a great adrenaline rush!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gâkhan 🌞 pfp
Gâkhan 🌞
@gokhan.eth
yup. l2s are just experimental from what I can perceive. hold some on 'the' mainnet; and, have some ready on a CEX, too is all i do.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Fran pfp
Fran
@0x99fran
At a very high level. Storing your eth on an l2 is very similar to parking your eth in a smart contract on the l1. There is lindy and audits and whatever to assure you that your funds are safe. But a smart contract (l2) will always be slightly riskier than having eth just sit in your wallet.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Darya777πŸ–πŸ”΅πŸŽ©πŸ¦•πŸ’Š pfp
Darya777πŸ–πŸ”΅πŸŽ©πŸ¦•πŸ’Š
@banisamadani777
Awarded you +100 πŸ”₯ FIRE. Promptly check your balance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction