Adam Cochran on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Adam Cochran pfp

Already asked on Twitter but let’s see if we get better answers here: If you could add or change, any one feature on Ethereum, what would it be and why?

9 replies

1 recast

14 reactions

ash pfp

I would add abstracted transactions. A way for users to obfuscate some identifiable info from a transaction. I know this goes against popular thinking on how blockchains should work but I think privacy is an important feature.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

ʞɔɐſ pfp

hmmm my gut reaction is “get rid of high gas fees” but that’s a feature; not a bug (despite how it feels when gas is high) I suppose I would add built address obfuscation abilities for privacy purposes; but the govt would lose their minds (we all saw what happened to tornado)

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Rue🗽 pfp

L2 interoperability without a doubt It will come (think we’ll see great progress in ‘24), just wish it was here now

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Claus Wilke pfp

Token approvals. They're the #1 reason for drained wallets and just seems a security nightmare overall. Yes gas fees would be higher for NFT trades without approvals but that's a fair tradeoff I think. If gas is too high go to L2 or wait for danksharding.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Zach pfp

Completely redo/rethink EOA UX. It's the biggest thing holding us back and I'm not convinced 4337 is a silver bullet. We'd fall over and die if we got true wide spread adoption in any usecase but speculation (people will crawl thru glass to make money, it's only an issue if we ever want to expand beyond that usecase).

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Caden pfp

EOA transaction batching (eg. approve contract, swap token, and revoke approval in the same block) https://twitter.com/0xfoobar/status/1738705101886275895

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Barnabé Monnot pfp

Barnabé Monnot

A fun one is charging base fee at the end of the block vs per tx. It would allow block producers to subsidise txs that are not willing to pay current base fee but might still have valuable MEV to extract. It’s a way of returning that MEV to the user tx

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

b0ggs.eth 🎩 pfp

I find MEV & transaction order as a function of gas fee/ priority fee interesting. Not sure they are problematic but a non-proportional amount of value is extracted from protocols. Imagine the positive feedback loops that would be created if that value went back into the immediate system of a protocol instead.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

shukudai.dayo.eth🌹☀️ pfp

shukudai.dayo.eth🌹☀️

@shukudaidayo.eth

Anything to make solo-staking easier: - Staking >32 ETH on a single validator - Maybe reducing the limit to 16 ETH? 8 ETH? - Native non-rebasing version of staked ETH for tax benefits? - Allow validators to also be L2 sequencers someday?? The answer to improving staking UX shouldn't be "let someone else do it"

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions